2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2288-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training: prospective randomized study of six trainees

Abstract: Cap-assisted colonoscopies might help to increase the rate of cecal intubation success and shorten the cecal intubation time for GI trainees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance to other reports indicating a benefit in technical performance of CAC with significant shortening of time for cecal intubation or for the whole procedure [29 -31, 33, 35]. This effect of the cap might be beneficial especially for unexperienced endoscopists [29,40]. Since colonoscopies were performed by experienced investigators in our study, the difference in investigation time between CAC and CC was small (1 minute) and therefore not of clinical relevance.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in accordance to other reports indicating a benefit in technical performance of CAC with significant shortening of time for cecal intubation or for the whole procedure [29 -31, 33, 35]. This effect of the cap might be beneficial especially for unexperienced endoscopists [29,40]. Since colonoscopies were performed by experienced investigators in our study, the difference in investigation time between CAC and CC was small (1 minute) and therefore not of clinical relevance.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…7 ADR of trainees is generally lower than that of experts 23,24 and has been reported to be 23%-36%. [25][26][27] Although a previous study reported no significant difference in ADR between EAC and CAC, 19 differences between these procedures when performed by trainees remain unclear. In the present study, the cecal intubation rate and time were similar between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A 63 % higher PDR and an 83 % higher adenoma detection rate were noted in the EC group compared to the SC group. Training was an important prerequisite of success when using this system [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%