2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs

Abstract: Context. The main goal of the CARMENES survey is to find Earth-mass planets around nearby M-dwarf stars. Seven M dwarfs included in the CARMENES sample had been observed before with HIRES and HARPS and either were reported to have one short period planetary companion (GJ 15 A, GJ 176, GJ 436, GJ 536 and GJ 1148) or are multiple planetary systems (GJ 581 and GJ 876). Aims. We aim to report new precise optical radial velocity measurements for these planet hosts and test the overall capabilities of CARME… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods assume that the observations (or their residuals in the case where some periodicities have been removed) contain only noise and that this noise is further uncorrelated with unknown variance. The noise statistics are estimated from the observations (see e.g., Jenkins et al 2013, Hobson, M. J. et al 2018, Trifonov et al 2018, Ment et al 2018). The FAP is evaluated by estimating the distribution of the test statistic using fake data, typically obtained by shuffling the data.…”
Section: Control Of the False Alarm: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods assume that the observations (or their residuals in the case where some periodicities have been removed) contain only noise and that this noise is further uncorrelated with unknown variance. The noise statistics are estimated from the observations (see e.g., Jenkins et al 2013, Hobson, M. J. et al 2018, Trifonov et al 2018, Ment et al 2018). The FAP is evaluated by estimating the distribution of the test statistic using fake data, typically obtained by shuffling the data.…”
Section: Control Of the False Alarm: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most likely stellar rotation frequency is shown with red dashed line, while the red shaded area denotes its uncertainties, as given by Díez Alonso et al (2019). extended HIRES data time series yields an additional RV signal with a period of ∼ 530 d, likely due to a second massive planet in the system. In Trifonov et al (2018b), we added 52 CARMENES RVs and performed a combined Doppler analysis, which revealed the two-planet configuration of the GJ 1148 system. We found the following orbital configuration for GJ 1148 b: m b sin i = 0.304 M Jup , P b = 41.380 d, e b = 0.379, a b = 0.166 au, and for GJ 1148 c: m c sin i = 0.214 M Jup , P c = 532.6 d, e c = 0.341, a c = 0.913 au.…”
Section: The Gj 1148 Planetary Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our first paper on GJ 1148 (Trifonov et al 2018b), we performed dynamical modeling of the GJ 1148 RV data and we studied the long-term stability of the best fit to the system, but at that time we did not perform a detailed long-term dynamical analysis of the GJ 1148 system. In this second paper, we aim to analyze the possible orbital configurations and planetary mass regimes based on an extensive long-term dynamical analysis that includes additional CARMENES Doppler data from recent observations.…”
Section: The Gj 1148 Planetary Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main goal of CARMENES is to discover and characterize Earth-like planets around an initial sample of about 300 M dwarfs (Reiners et al 2018b). To date, the program has already confirmed eight planet candidates from large-scale photometric and spectroscopic surveys (e.g., Trifonov et al 2018;Sarkis et al 2018) and detected more than ten new planets (e.g., Reiners et al 2018a;Kaminski et al 2018;Luque et al 2018Luque et al , 2019Ribas et al 2018;Nagel et al 2019;Perger et al 2019;Zechmeister et al 2019;Morales et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%