2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30183-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for a Hybrid P2P Search Infrastructure

Abstract: Abstract. Popular P2P file-sharing systems like Gnutella and Kazaa use unstructured network designs. These networks typically adopt flooding-based search techniques to locate files. While flooding-based techniques are effective for locating highly replicated items, they are poorly suited for locating rare items. As an alternative, a wide variety of structured P2P networks such as distributed hash tables (DHTs) have been recently proposed. Structured networks can efficiently locate rare items, but they incur si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, queries for rare objects are also substantial [10]. Both studies correctly reflect different aspects of the Zipfian distributions.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, queries for rare objects are also substantial [10]. Both studies correctly reflect different aspects of the Zipfian distributions.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…SimpleHybrid combines Gnutella and the DHT-based PIERSearch [10,11]. To improve the search efficiency, GAB [25] makes search decisions based on global statistics of documents' popularity (In this paper, we will use the terms of "item" and "document" interchangeably).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [10,11], a query is flooded with a limited depth first, and, if no result is returned, the query goes to the DHT. Such a design is simple and effective but inefficient in that it incurs extra overhead.…”
Section: Challenging Issues In Popularity Based Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations