2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
85
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated in the case example of Canadian seed science given in this article, decision makers are often firmly entrenched within hegemonic value frameworks, in part because they are themselves members of the dominant groups (Palm & Hansson, 2006). Moreover, given the nature of gaining specialized expertise in technical policy making -usually gathered through a long process of enculturation in domain-specific knowledge (Collins, 2007) -technology developers are rarely conscious of the wider effects of their products, perhaps especially on historically marginalized players in the innovation ecosystem (Ottinger & Cohen, 2013).…”
Section: Kelly Bronsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in the case example of Canadian seed science given in this article, decision makers are often firmly entrenched within hegemonic value frameworks, in part because they are themselves members of the dominant groups (Palm & Hansson, 2006). Moreover, given the nature of gaining specialized expertise in technical policy making -usually gathered through a long process of enculturation in domain-specific knowledge (Collins, 2007) -technology developers are rarely conscious of the wider effects of their products, perhaps especially on historically marginalized players in the innovation ecosystem (Ottinger & Cohen, 2013).…”
Section: Kelly Bronsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 I am not implying that presently there are no methodologies that are based on a non-externalist approach. CTA (Schot and Rip 1996), ethical TA (Palm and Hansson 2006), VSD (Friedman et al 2002), Participatory Design (Schuler and Namioka 1993), to name but a few, do this already, but how worked out their conceptual frameworks are vary. The aim of this article is to outline a conceptual framework in manner that creates a link between a theoretical Philosophy of Technology to more practical-empirical fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accessed 22 September 2011. 6 Although the term soft impact is recent, values and norms in relation to technology have been discussed in ethics and technology assessment, albeit often implicit, for a long time (Palm and Hansson 2006). I shall continue to use 'soft impacts', although, with some discomfort.…”
Section: Designing Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the development of technology assessment over the last four decades has been provided [7]. The emergence of organised technology assessment, as a formal procedure, was, first and foremost, an attempt to predict the unintended negative consequences of technical innovations in the market uptake cycle of technologies [6] to facilitate more adequate policy-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of organised technology assessment, as a formal procedure, was, first and foremost, an attempt to predict the unintended negative consequences of technical innovations in the market uptake cycle of technologies [6] to facilitate more adequate policy-making. An expectation of technology assessment was that it should reveal the future consequences of new technology that otherwise would not have been recognized [7]. With respect to renewable and clean energy technology development, some studies acknowledge the need to analyse the development as a complex system [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%