2002
DOI: 10.1257/000282802760015829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries: Reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
489
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(512 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
17
489
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the strong empirical interest in the factor content of trade (e.g., Davis and Weinstein, 1998;Trefler, 1995) it is remarkable that this proposition has attracted so little econometric study. In some degree, papers that place relative factor costs into FDI equations implicitly are looking for correlations between factor prices in segmented markets and investment flows.…”
Section: Fdi In Factor Endowment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the strong empirical interest in the factor content of trade (e.g., Davis and Weinstein, 1998;Trefler, 1995) it is remarkable that this proposition has attracted so little econometric study. In some degree, papers that place relative factor costs into FDI equations implicitly are looking for correlations between factor prices in segmented markets and investment flows.…”
Section: Fdi In Factor Endowment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed issues are not described here for reasons of brevity but interested readers are referred to Trefler (1995) and Leamer (2000). More recently, see Krugman (2000), the factor content model has had a wider acceptability restored through a re-interpretation of its meaning and the model retains validity as a tool of analysis for the study of international trade and the implications for FDI.…”
Section: The Factor Content Of Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even Trefler, whose criticisms were noted at the outset of this section, concluded in his 1 Emphasis added 1995 test of Heckscher-Ohlin that "the model that performed best combined Armington home bias with neutral international technology differences." (Trefler, 1995) Though there seems to be an insistence on the part of some scholars to discredit the H-O Theorem, no doubt prompting the exclamation mark at the end of Wood's title, attempts at doing so have remained inconclusive. Leontief himself disagreed with his paradox, and in the end it was proven to be flawed because he was missing something: natural resources as a factor of production.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%