2003
DOI: 10.21099/tkbjm/1496164556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cauchy Problem for Strictly Hyperbolic Operators with Non-Absolutely Continuous Coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following [4,5], we show that Theorem 2.1 implies the H ±∞ well-posedness of problem (4.1) also in this case. Then the Cauchy problem (4.1) is well-posed in H ±∞ .…”
Section: Strictly Hyperbolic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following [4,5], we show that Theorem 2.1 implies the H ±∞ well-posedness of problem (4.1) also in this case. Then the Cauchy problem (4.1) is well-posed in H ±∞ .…”
Section: Strictly Hyperbolic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The optimal exponent for the C ∞ well-posedness is q = 1. The dependence on space variables was allowed in [4], the sharp bound…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results have been improved by Cicognani [3], [4] allowing dependence of the coefficients on x and equations of higher order .…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus if we are interested in H ∞ well-posedness results for higher order equations, then we are not able to formulate assumptions as (2.4) with a 1, but we are forced to choose a = 0. This is done in [1,2].…”
Section: Relations To Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%