2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The central engine of GRB 130831A and the energy breakdown of a relativistic explosion

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
6
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also tried a fit with the afterglow described by a broken power-law, but found that the break time and post-break decay slope are unconstrained, while at the same time the k, s parameters hardly changed. Therefore, there is no evidence in the afterglow of a break between 0.4 and ∼ 3 days, in agreement with the lack of a break in the late X-ray light curve (De Pasquale et al 2016).…”
Section: Appendix A4: Grb 130831asupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also tried a fit with the afterglow described by a broken power-law, but found that the break time and post-break decay slope are unconstrained, while at the same time the k, s parameters hardly changed. Therefore, there is no evidence in the afterglow of a break between 0.4 and ∼ 3 days, in agreement with the lack of a break in the late X-ray light curve (De Pasquale et al 2016).…”
Section: Appendix A4: Grb 130831asupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Afterglow properties: The early optical afterglow light curve (at t 5 ks) is complex and variable, and is discussed in detail in De Pasquale et al (2016). We did not use this data for the calculation of the light curve parameters.…”
Section: Appendix A4: Grb 130831amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the GRB outflow still produces X-ray afterglow by the external shock during the internal plateau phase, it is expected to emerge once the X-ray emission from the magnetar wind drops below the external component. This has been seen clearly in several X-ray afterglows of both long and short GRBs (Troja et al 2007;Lyons et al 2010;Rowlinson et al 2013;Lü & Zhang 2014;Lü et al 2015;De Pasquale et al 2016;Zhang, Huang & Zong 2016). The external component typically shows a power-law (PL) decay with slope of ∼ 1 which is consistent with the prediction of the standard afterglow models (Sari, Piran & Narayan 1998;Chevalier & Li 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…7 Currently, our optical telescopes range in size from 14 to 40 inches, and span four continents. Originally envisioned for gammaray burst follow-up (Reichart et al 2005, Haislip et al 2006, Dai et al 2007, Updike et al 2008, Nysewander et al 2009, Cenko et al 2011, Cano et al 2011, Bufano et al 2012, Jin et al 2013, Morgan et al 2014, Martin-Carrillo et al 2014, Friis et al 2015, De Pasquale et al 2016, Bardho et al 2016, Melandri et al 2017), Skynet has also been used to study gravitational-wave sources (Abbott et al 2017a, 2017b, blazars (Osterman Meyer et al 2008, Liu et al 2017, Goyal et al 2017, supernovae (Foley et al 2010, Pignata et al 2011, Valenti et al 2011, Pastorello et al 2013, Milisavljevic et al 2013, Maund et al 2013, Stritzinger et al 2014, Inserra et al 2014, Takats et al 2014, Dall'Ora et al 2014, Folatelli et al 2014, Barbarino et al 2015, de Jaeger et al 2016, Gutierrez et al 2016, Tartaglia et al 2017, Prentice et al 2018, supernova remnants (Trotter et al 2017), novae (Schaefer et al ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%