2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61092-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of managing drug interactions in elderly people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
291
0
32

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(342 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
291
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…A large proportion of drugs are metabolised or excreted by the kidney and thus CKD patients have an increased risk of druginduced encephalopathy. In addition to filtration and half-life considerations, 24 protein binding and drug interactions 25 may also be important factors in managing drug toxicity in CKD.…”
Section: Encephalopathy and Deliriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large proportion of drugs are metabolised or excreted by the kidney and thus CKD patients have an increased risk of druginduced encephalopathy. In addition to filtration and half-life considerations, 24 protein binding and drug interactions 25 may also be important factors in managing drug toxicity in CKD.…”
Section: Encephalopathy and Deliriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacodynamic interactions can lead to amplification or reduction in the therapeutic effects or adverse effects of a specific drug. 28 A pharmacodynamic interaction may be due to irrational prescribing, such as initiation of TCA (with anticholinergic effect) in a patient with Alzheimer disease treated with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, which may lead to deterioration of the cognitive status. Even with rational polypharmacy, a combination of 2 drugs 30 Life-threatening opioid intoxication has been reported in association with codeine use in a UM.…”
Section: Adrs Associated With the Treatment Of Npmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies may be conducted in silico, in vitro or in vivo, the latter comprising formal pharmacokinetic interaction studies in animals and humans, or as reports of clinical observations.The assessment of these studies is seldom explicit, and there is lack of consistency and considerable disparity between resources [2][3][4][5][6]. For example, in a recent study of four international drug interaction compendia, between 14% and 44% of the interactions classified as major in any one compendium were not listed in other compendia [4].Thus, interpreting the clinical relevance of a given perpetrator is often difficult, particularly for healthcare providers subject to 'information overload' and 'alert fatigue' [7,8]. Computerized DDI checkers at the point of prescribing appear no better, delivering alerts that are frequently irrelevant to clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%