2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenge of ‘Technological Choices’for Materials Science Approaches in Archaeology*

Abstract: Recently several anthropological and sociological studies have interpreted technologies as cultural choices that are determined as much by local perceptions and the social context fly any material constraints or purely functional criteria. Using the example of ceramic technology we consider how materials science studies can contribute to and benefit from this understanding of technology as a social construct. Although we acknowledge some potential difficulties, it is our contention that both materials scientis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0
20

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
119
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Lechtman 1977, White 1988, Veldhuijzen & Rehren 2007, technological choice (e.g. Lemonnier 1993, Sillar & Tite 2000, and advocates of practice, agency, and materiality in archaeological theory (e.g. Dobres & Hoffman 1994, Gardner 2008, Jones 2002, Martinón-Torres et al 2007, Martinón-Torres & Rehren 2008, Taylor 2008.…”
Section: Social Constructionism and Ancient Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lechtman 1977, White 1988, Veldhuijzen & Rehren 2007, technological choice (e.g. Lemonnier 1993, Sillar & Tite 2000, and advocates of practice, agency, and materiality in archaeological theory (e.g. Dobres & Hoffman 1994, Gardner 2008, Jones 2002, Martinón-Torres et al 2007, Martinón-Torres & Rehren 2008, Taylor 2008.…”
Section: Social Constructionism and Ancient Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that livestock dung is a valuable source of fuel in many rural communities across the world (Miller, 1984;Anderson and Ertug-Yaras, 1998;Reddy, 1998;Sillar, 2000). Among traditional societies dung is an important secondary product that can be used in varied range of ways (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of material culture in mapping identity has therefore been much-written about (Kramer 1985a, Hegmon 1992, Pfaffenberger 1992, Gosselain 1999, Hegmon 2000, Livingstone 2000, Sillar & Tite 2000, Stark 2003. A body of theory usually glossed as the 'theory of technology' has recently made important advances by considering technology as a cultural product.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%