1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90109-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The changes in electrical activity of the postural muscles of the mandible upon varying the vertical dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1
6

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
41
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, during trial 3, the postural eontraetile activities of the elevator muscles showed some deerease (Table 2). These observations are consistent with the faet that raising of the bite, as occurs with the insertion of an oeelusal splint, results in decreased postural activity in the mandibular elevator museles and increased postural aetivity in the mandibular depressor muscles (Garnick & Ramfjord, 1962;Manns et al, 1981;Rugh & Drago, 1981;Plesh et al, 1988). Table 4 shows that the highest clinical resolution of the recorded myoelectric activities was that pertaining to trial 3, probably because of a stabilizing effeet of the ocelusal splint (Dahlstrom, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, during trial 3, the postural eontraetile activities of the elevator muscles showed some deerease (Table 2). These observations are consistent with the faet that raising of the bite, as occurs with the insertion of an oeelusal splint, results in decreased postural activity in the mandibular elevator museles and increased postural aetivity in the mandibular depressor muscles (Garnick & Ramfjord, 1962;Manns et al, 1981;Rugh & Drago, 1981;Plesh et al, 1988). Table 4 shows that the highest clinical resolution of the recorded myoelectric activities was that pertaining to trial 3, probably because of a stabilizing effeet of the ocelusal splint (Dahlstrom, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is characterized by minimal electrical activity and an interocclusal space between the incisors of 5 to 12 mm. It depends, however, on the experimental conditions and the muscle type examined (Manns et al, 1981;Rugh and Drago, 1981;Van Sickels et al, 1985;Plesh et al, 1988). This represents a much greater distance than the usual free-way space (or interocclusal distance) ( Fig.).…”
Section: Regulations and Changes In The Habitual Mandibular Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] Actually, it is well known that clinical rest position is always more cranially located than EMG rest position, with an average difference of 6 mm 13 or 6.3 mm. 14 Therefore, clinical rest position was not at a position where jaw muscle activity was minimal.…”
Section: Electromyographic Evaluation Of Anterior Temporal and Suprahmentioning
confidence: 99%