2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristics of magma reservoir failure beneath a volcanic edifice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
37
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shallow magma chamber (Figure f) shows a forebulge maximum at twice the edifice radius from the edifice axis with a distinguishable maximum, similar to Comer et al (), and the forebulge predicted for the deeper magma chamber is beyond the two‐radius limit with little bulge visible. We propose that a shallower magma chamber and/or a smaller T e produce a more pronounced forebulge since they have greater influence on the lithosphere upper boundary, which is consistent with the models of Grosfils (), Hurwitz et al (), Galgana et al (), and Galgana et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shallow magma chamber (Figure f) shows a forebulge maximum at twice the edifice radius from the edifice axis with a distinguishable maximum, similar to Comer et al (), and the forebulge predicted for the deeper magma chamber is beyond the two‐radius limit with little bulge visible. We propose that a shallower magma chamber and/or a smaller T e produce a more pronounced forebulge since they have greater influence on the lithosphere upper boundary, which is consistent with the models of Grosfils (), Hurwitz et al (), Galgana et al (), and Galgana et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Grosfils (, and the references therein) summarize the analytic approaches to the data within the paper and compare them with an FEM model, which primarily considered the variation in magma chamber rupture with depth of burial. Hurwitz et al () expanded the model to include the impact of edifice growth on chamber rupture behavior and predicted the blocking of magma ascent and magma flow re‐routing to radial flow on edifice mass increase. Galgana et al () incorporated the effects of lithospheric flexure into the model and Bistacchi extended the rheological behavior and demonstrated correlation between the model (Bistacchi et al, ) and the distribution of cone sheets and dikes in the Cullen Igneous Province.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics of magma ascent in dikes has been the subject of numerous studies [e.g., Lister and Kerr , ; Rubin , ; Gudmundsson , , ; Ito and Martel , ]. Others have considered magma chamber pressurization beneath small (relative to Venus volcanoes) volcanic edifices and the orientations of intrusions emanating from them [e.g., Pinel and Jaupart , , ; Grosfils , ; Long and Grosfils , ; Hurwitz et al ., ]. However, none of these studies explicitly addressed flexural stress states, which can provide stress magnitudes well in excess of those from simple compression of the substratum and significantly different distributions of stress with depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, deformation is also governed by the rheology of the magma, temperature and viscosity of the bedrock, the driving pressure, stresses resulting from the intrusion itself, dynamic fluid transport through the chamber and the bedrock, and many other temporally and spatially variable factors discussed elsewhere in the literature (e.g. Anderson, 1936;Rubin and Pollard, 1987;Lister and Kerr, 1991;Rubin, 1995;Day, 1996;Fialko et al, 2001;Hurwitz et al, 2009;Karlstrom et al, 2010, Galgana et al, 2011, de Saint Blanquat et al, 2011. Our near future perspectives are to improve the modeling of coupled hydromechanics (Gerbault et al, in prep.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%