2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this logic, high complexity decision problems emerge that require the use of PSMs because of the problems' unmanageable structure. PSMs are often called "soft operations End of Table 1 research" or "soft systems", and these methods are effective tools with which trained facilitators can help groups facing challenges on a decision-making level (Marttunen et al, 2017;Smith & Shaw, 2019). Fuzzy cognitive mapping is one of the most well-known PSMs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this logic, high complexity decision problems emerge that require the use of PSMs because of the problems' unmanageable structure. PSMs are often called "soft operations End of Table 1 research" or "soft systems", and these methods are effective tools with which trained facilitators can help groups facing challenges on a decision-making level (Marttunen et al, 2017;Smith & Shaw, 2019). Fuzzy cognitive mapping is one of the most well-known PSMs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosenhead and Mingers [32] further established the characteristics of these PSMs, namely that they are non-optimising, are less dependent on quantitative data, integrate hard and soft data with social judgement, are simple and transparent, conceptualise people as active subjects, facilitate planning from the bottom up, accept uncertainty and aim to keep options open. Recently, Smith and Shaw [39] highlighted through an exploratory review of the literature that four additional characteristics of PSMs can be added based on a four-pillar framework that focuses on system characteristics, knowledge and the involvement of stakeholders, the values of model building and structured analysis. These additional characteristics of PSMs are as follows: the approach identifies a system to model, the model-building process is generic and transferrable to multiple problem contexts, the approach structures knowledge through different stages of analysis and the approach has distinct phases of divergent and convergent thinking.…”
Section: Current Problem-structuring and Decision-making Methods In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These additional characteristics of PSMs are as follows: the approach identifies a system to model, the model-building process is generic and transferrable to multiple problem contexts, the approach structures knowledge through different stages of analysis and the approach has distinct phases of divergent and convergent thinking. The major PSMs that confirm all the characteristics, as listed by Smith and Shaw [39], are soft systems methodology (SSM) [40], the strategic choice approach (SCA) [41], strategic options development and analysis [42] and robustness analysis (RA) [32].…”
Section: Current Problem-structuring and Decision-making Methods In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PSMs have been criticised for their apparent stagnation in their development within academia, amidst notions that the development of PSM skills are difficult, that the wider OR community has not bought-into PSMs and that the PSM community is small, though active (Morrill 2007). Nevertheless, there is still activity with more recent developments relating to the evaluation of PSMs (Midgley et al 2013;Lami and Tavella 2019), the characterisation of PSMs (Smith and Shaw 2019) and application in Community OR (Johnson et al 2018), with Behavioural OR examining how people engage with OR methods to support problem solving (Hämäläinen et al 2013;Kunc et al 2016;Franco and Hämäläinen 2016;White et al 2020). Other developments include those of practitioners, but these tend not to be written formally for wider consumption (Morrill 2007).…”
Section: How a Problem Is Defined Through The Or Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%