2019
DOI: 10.1002/jms.4441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characterization of column heating effect in nanoflow liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (nanoLC‐MS)–based proteomics

Abstract: Column heating strategy is often applied in nano-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer (nanoHPLC-MS) platform for enhancing the analytical efficiency of peptides or proteins. Nonetheless, the influence effects of column heating in peptides or proteins identification still lack of deep understanding. In this study, a systematic comparison of room temperature (RT) and column heating of nanoHPLC was done. Based on the data, under column heating condition, the backpressure of nanoHPLC can be dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample was analyzed by using an EASY-nLC 1200 HPLC tandem with the Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The peptide was resolved in buffer A (2% ACN in water and 0.1% formic acid) and separated by using a home-made C 18 capillary column (25 cm × 75 μm, 1.9 µm particle size, and 100 Å pore size) ( Li et al, 2020b ), A column oven was used and the heating temperature was set at 60°C ( Kyte and Doolittle, 1982 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was analyzed by using an EASY-nLC 1200 HPLC tandem with the Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The peptide was resolved in buffer A (2% ACN in water and 0.1% formic acid) and separated by using a home-made C 18 capillary column (25 cm × 75 μm, 1.9 µm particle size, and 100 Å pore size) ( Li et al, 2020b ), A column oven was used and the heating temperature was set at 60°C ( Kyte and Doolittle, 1982 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peptide samples were resuspended in buffer C (0.1% formic acid (FA) in 2 % ACN) and loaded onto a home‐made 20 cm capillary column (75 μm internal diameter) with packing C 18 resins (1.8 μm particle size, 100 Å pole size, Dikma Technologies, USA). The column was heated with the temperature kept at 60°C [31]. A 65 min gradient with a constant flow rate of 300 nL/min was used to separate peptides.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty percent of data was withheld for model evaluation. Chronologer was evaluated against competing tools (DeepLC, Prosit, SSRCalc, DeepPhospho) using tryptic HeLa peptides by Searle et al, 6 a multi-protease panel by Richard et al, 43 tryptic peptides separated at different column temperatures by Li et al, 44 and phosphopeptides from HeLa lysate by Searle et al. 45 Prosit predictions were made using the 2019 iRT model through the available ProteomicsDB web server; DeepLC predictions were performed locally with v.1.1.2 and the pre-trained model based on Bruderer et al; 28 DeepPhospho predictions were performed locally using the 20211212 build with the included pre-trained RT model.…”
Section: Chronologer Architecture Model Training and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%