Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Demmer and Salomon (2013) maintain that the courts are fixing Kanak identity and “values” in law in an essentialist, reductionist and regressive way, which fails to take into account the continual transformation of Kanak society and social norms, contemporary realities, and the multiplicity of Kanak identities and modes of life today. Moreover, these authors argue that “judicial custom” represents a new source of social discrimination and violence rather than a victory over the denial of Kanak difference, because it reinforces certain power relations within Kanak society and penalizes the most vulnerable and dominated members thereof, such as women, youth, homosexuals, and men and clans of low social rank in the customary hierarchy.…”