2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.12.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chemical structure of the amorphous phase of propylene–ethylene random copolymers in relation to their stress–strain properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the CPMAS spectra obtained for polypropylene homopolymer (Figure A) there is a marked development of additional signals to the methylene and methine carbons at 46.5 and 28.5 ppm, respectively with increasing temperature. These resonances were also detected in the 60 °C TREF fractions of samples with higher total ethylene contents (refer to Figure D) as well as in the random copolymers analyzed by Agarwal et al . and were assigned to methylene and methine carbons in amorphous polypropylene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the CPMAS spectra obtained for polypropylene homopolymer (Figure A) there is a marked development of additional signals to the methylene and methine carbons at 46.5 and 28.5 ppm, respectively with increasing temperature. These resonances were also detected in the 60 °C TREF fractions of samples with higher total ethylene contents (refer to Figure D) as well as in the random copolymers analyzed by Agarwal et al . and were assigned to methylene and methine carbons in amorphous polypropylene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Agarwal et al . investigated the chain dynamics of the amorphous phase of a series of commercial random ethylene–propylene copolymers and a single HEPC using solid‐state 1 H NMR experiments . Lovisi et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the r E ′ · r P ′ value of alloy‐1 is 21.4, almost twice that of alloy‐2, indicating higher blockiness of the s‐EP chains formed in the presence of CHMDMS. In addition, the proportion of alternating triads PEP in alloy‐1 is lower than that in alloy‐2, which also shows a weaker blockiness in alloy‐2 . The average sequence length of the ethylene unit ( n E ′) in these two alloys is almost the same, however, the average sequence length of the propylene unit ( n P ′) of alloy‐1 is larger than that of alloy‐2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Impact poly(propylene) copolymers (IPCs) have been used extensively for many applications in the automotive, packaging, and electrical appliances industries since these materials have superior properties over traditional poly(propylene) (PP) materials due to their multiphase morphology where ethylene–propylene rubber particles are incorporated in an isotactic poly(propylene) ( it ‐PP) matrix . As such, IPC materials have increased impact strengths and tensile‐fracture properties as compared to it ‐PP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%