“…The experimental consequences of the effect of increasing ring size on the accommodation of sterically demanding tripodal ligands are nicely illustrated by a comparison of the known auxiliaries RuðPR 0 3 Þ 2 ðg-C 5 R 5 Þ and MoðPR 0 3 Þ 2 ðg-C 7 H 7 Þ. Accordingly, whilst the bis(triphenylphosphine) auxiliary Ru(PPh 3 ) 2 (g-C 5 R 5 ) is one of the cornerstones of the organometallic chemistry of ruthenium [7], the chemistry of bis(phosphine) cycloheptatrienyl systems MoðPR 0 3 Þ 2 -ðg-C 7 H 7 Þ is dominated by complexes of the chelate phosphine Ph 2 PCH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 (dppe) [4,8,9] or small cone angle P-donor ligands such as P(OMe) 3 [10]. This paper reports the syntheses of the sterically crowded complexes [M(CO)-(PPh 3 ) 2 (g-C 7 H 7 )] + (M = Mo or W), the first examples of derivatives of the bis(triphenylphosphine) auxiliary M(PPh 3 ) 2 (g-C 7 H 7 ), and explores the structural modifications required to accommodate the combination of sterically demanding ring and phosphine ligands in a halfsandwich complex.…”