2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chinese version of the multidimensional health locus of control scale form C in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal reliability of the three subscales was appropriate in the present sample; the alpha values were well above those found in the Chinese investigations [12], [13]. Our results concerning internal consistency are also in line with previous studies showing that the Internal and Chance subscales have adequate alpha values, while those of the shorter subscales are only around the .70 threshold [1], [10], [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internal reliability of the three subscales was appropriate in the present sample; the alpha values were well above those found in the Chinese investigations [12], [13]. Our results concerning internal consistency are also in line with previous studies showing that the Internal and Chance subscales have adequate alpha values, while those of the shorter subscales are only around the .70 threshold [1], [10], [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Contrary to the A and B forms of the MHLC Scales, relatively few studies have investigated the psychometric properties of Form C; this is particularly true for non-English speaking countries. Of the few investigations conducted in these countries, Italian [10] and Swedish [11] examinations confirmed the hypothesized four-factor structure, reliability, and validity of the instrument, while findings from China [12], [13] consistently disaffirmed the psychometric adequacy of the instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This could be due either to the translation into German or the brevity of the scale (3 items only). With regard to the 'doctors' scale, the results are in line with a translation into Cantonese by Ip & Martin [22]. When applied to pregnant women, poor internal consistency, possibly due to existing cultural differences and linguistic comprehension, was reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We found suboptimal Cronbach's alpha values in several subscales. Issues regarding to the reliability of the translation of the MHLC has not only occurred in the Indonesian version, but also in the Chinese version of the MHLC that found suboptimal Cronbach's alpha values in several subscales (internal HLC=0.52, doctors HLC=0.51, powerful others HLC=0.44 and chance HLC=0.66) (Ip and Martin, 2006). Theoretically, Cronbach's alpha is related to the test length; therefore, the poor alpha value in the Powerful others subscales may be attributed to the small number of items in the subscales (n=3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%