2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-017-0148-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem: Analysis of a Local Structural Consolidation

Abstract: Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Iran University of Science and Technology. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be selfarchived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Nativity Church restored and some components rebuilt again many times, so it has different materials which can be noticed through visual inspection, but it is difficult to use in-situ inspection techniques such as coring, flat jack test, sonic tomography, thermo vision, etc., due to privacy and saintliness, as well as the political situation and lack of technology and available devices. The mechanical properties of the materials used in the numerical model will be used based on onsite tests, which have been carried out by [26]. These tests focused on the structural components of the Church and the material properties of masonry walls like compressive strength (Fm), shear strength (td), Young's modulus (E), shear modulus (G), Poisson coefficient (υ), and self-weight (w).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Nativity Church restored and some components rebuilt again many times, so it has different materials which can be noticed through visual inspection, but it is difficult to use in-situ inspection techniques such as coring, flat jack test, sonic tomography, thermo vision, etc., due to privacy and saintliness, as well as the political situation and lack of technology and available devices. The mechanical properties of the materials used in the numerical model will be used based on onsite tests, which have been carried out by [26]. These tests focused on the structural components of the Church and the material properties of masonry walls like compressive strength (Fm), shear strength (td), Young's modulus (E), shear modulus (G), Poisson coefficient (υ), and self-weight (w).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Load Step (9), has a crack width of 2.40 mm, and for the Load Step (11), the crack width was 2.29 mm, which means that the difference was 5%. [26] found that it is obvious that crack propagation is reliable in the investigation of the historical masonry structures, as not only the bandwidth of cracks is checked, but also the length of cracks can be checked and investigated, and give a good indication of what will happen for seismic loads. On another hand, the out-of-plane stiffness of the church is lower than in-plane stiffness, the Y-direction was more deformed and had a larger crack width, numerically, the maximum crack width before Load Step (10), i.e., Load Step (9) was 2.80 mm, and after the Load Step (10), i.e., Load Step ( 12), was 10.40 mm.…”
Section: Cracks In Y-directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practical engineering, the mechanical properties of the enveloped steel jacket are excellent, because it is more convenient in construction [3]. e effective method of SRC structure reinforcement has been applied more and more widely in the USA, Canada, Japan and in Europe recently [4,5]. Hence, for existing concrete structures, a thorough evaluation of seismic-damaged SRC columns which confined with enveloped steel jacket need to mitigate shear failure under earthquake loading, whereas for new concrete structures, the confined columns must be designed with sufficient shear capacity to sustain the whole building in an earthquake [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%