“…For example, the Load Step (9), has a crack width of 2.40 mm, and for the Load Step (11), the crack width was 2.29 mm, which means that the difference was 5%. [26] found that it is obvious that crack propagation is reliable in the investigation of the historical masonry structures, as not only the bandwidth of cracks is checked, but also the length of cracks can be checked and investigated, and give a good indication of what will happen for seismic loads. On another hand, the out-of-plane stiffness of the church is lower than in-plane stiffness, the Y-direction was more deformed and had a larger crack width, numerically, the maximum crack width before Load Step (10), i.e., Load Step (9) was 2.80 mm, and after the Load Step (10), i.e., Load Step ( 12), was 10.40 mm.…”