1994
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/271.3.649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CI/CO/ ratio in the molecular cloud G 34.3 + 0.2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All numbers are summarised in Table 1. We find C i/CO abundance ratios between 0.07 and 0.13. The C i/CO abundance ratio previously measured in star-forming regions covers the range between about 0.03 and 3 2 (Mookerjea et al 2006;Little et al 1994;Sun et al 2008). The values found for G48.65-0.29 are found at the lower end of this range and this is consistent with the picture of atomic carbon being produced by star-formation processes in which more quiescent clouds, without internal UV fields, show lower C i/CO ratios than more evolved, active star-forming sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…All numbers are summarised in Table 1. We find C i/CO abundance ratios between 0.07 and 0.13. The C i/CO abundance ratio previously measured in star-forming regions covers the range between about 0.03 and 3 2 (Mookerjea et al 2006;Little et al 1994;Sun et al 2008). The values found for G48.65-0.29 are found at the lower end of this range and this is consistent with the picture of atomic carbon being produced by star-formation processes in which more quiescent clouds, without internal UV fields, show lower C i/CO ratios than more evolved, active star-forming sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For all sources, except G34.26+0.15, the virial masses coincide with the masses derived from 13 CO column densities within a factor of two. The comparison of the intensities of the 13 CO and C 18 O lines in G34.26+0.15, presented in Little et al (1994), leads to the conclusion that the 13 CO lines are not optically thin. Hence, the derived 13 CO column density and mass of this source are underestimated.…”
Section: Source Parameters Derived From the Mapsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Bergin et al, 2004;Glover & Mac Low, 2007b). The assumption of one-dimensional symmetry, although computationally convenient, is less easy to justify, as the resulting models are unable to explain some notable features of real molecular clouds such as the widespread distribution of atomic carbon (Frerking et al, 1989;Little et al, 1994;Schilke et al, 1995). Accounting for clumping within the cloud greatly alleviates this issue (see e.g.…”
Section: Formation Of Molecular Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%