The CKC Challenge: Exploring Tools for Collaborative Knowledge Construction

Noy, Natalya F.; Chugh, Abhita; Alani, Harith

doi:10.1109/mis.2008.14

Cited by 42 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Web 2.0 refers to the second generation of web design that allows users to easily create, share, tag and connect content. Following on from this, there is a new generation of Wiki tools that supports the integration of Web 2.0 and Semantic Web 3.0 approaches (Noy et al, 2008).…”

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A dynamic knowledge management framework for the high value manufacturing industry

Piorkowski

Gao

Martin

2013

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dynamic Knowledge Management (KM) is a combination of cultural and technological factors, including the cultural factors of people and their motivations, technological factors of content and infrastructure and, where these both come together, interface factors. In this paper a Dynamic KM framework is described in the context of employees being motivated to create profit for their company through product development in high value manufacturing. It is reported how the framework was discussed during a meeting of the collaborating company's (BAE Systems) project stakeholders. Participants agreed the framework would have most benefit at the start of the product lifecycle before key decisions were made. The framework has been designed to support organisational learning and to reward employees that improve the position of the company in the market place.

show abstract

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A dynamic knowledge management framework for the high value manufacturing industry

Piorkowski

Gao

Martin

2013

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It also got favorable comments such as from users in a workshop for comparing several ontology development tools. [8] mentions the comment as "it's not surprising that users liked the visual aids that some of the tools provided, such as Hozo's interactive graphs". However, in one of our research projects, such an interface has been proven to be insufficient for domain experts of sustainability science to understand the content of the ontology which is one of the significant goals.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding an Ontology through Divergent Exploration

Kozaki

Hirota

Mizoguchi

2011

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. It is important that the ontology captures the essential conceptual structure of the target world as generally as possible. However, such ontologies are sometimes regarded as weak and shallow by domain experts because they often want to understand the target world from the domain-specific viewpoints in which they are interested. Therefore, it is highly desirable to have not only knowledge structuring from the general perspective but also from the domainspecific and multi-perspective so that concepts are structured for appropriate understanding from the multiple experts. On the basis of this observation, the authors propose a novel approach, called divergent exploration of an ontology, to bridge the gap between ontologies and domain experts. Based on the approach, we developed an ontology exploration tool and evaluated the system through an experimental use by experts in an environmental domain. As a result, we confirmed that the tool supports experts to obtain meaningful knowledge for them through the divergent exploration and it contributes to integrated understanding of the ontology and its target domain.

show abstract

“…This section provides a brief comparison of the features provided by OntoMediate and other tools for collaborative knowledge construction and sharing [11] (the comparison is limited to the tools presented at the CKC 2007 workshop 1 ). Table 1 compares the features provided by some of the latest tools for collaborative knowledge construction and sharing.…”

Section: Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%