2020
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/vzus4
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The classification accuracy and consistency of comparative judgement of writing compared to rubric-based teacher assessment

Abstract: Writing is generally assessed internationally using rubric-based approaches, but there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that the reliability of such approaches is poor. In contrast, comparative judgement studies suggest that it is possible to assess open ended tasks such as writing with greater reliability. Many previous studies, however, have failed to provide direct comparisons between these approaches as the reliability measures for rubric- and marking-based studies are not comparable with the inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following repeated comparisons, the resulting data are statistically modeled, and responses are ranked on a scale of relative quality. It is claimed that comparative judgment is a more reliable method of assessing students' work than traditional absolute judgment, such as using rubrics and marking scales (Wheadon, de Moira, & Christodoulou, 2020). The teachers used software available at the website of the company No More Marking Ltd https://www.nomoremarking.com/ to judge samples of students' writing in response to tasks that had elicited the CDFs of define , evaluate , and explore .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following repeated comparisons, the resulting data are statistically modeled, and responses are ranked on a scale of relative quality. It is claimed that comparative judgment is a more reliable method of assessing students' work than traditional absolute judgment, such as using rubrics and marking scales (Wheadon, de Moira, & Christodoulou, 2020). The teachers used software available at the website of the company No More Marking Ltd https://www.nomoremarking.com/ to judge samples of students' writing in response to tasks that had elicited the CDFs of define , evaluate , and explore .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%