At least half of all human pre-mRNAs are subject to alternative 3 processing that may modulate both the coding capacity of the message and the array of post-transcriptional regulatory elements embedded within the 3 UTR. Vertebrate poly(A) site selection appears to rely primarily on the binding of CPSF to an A(A/U)UAAA hexamer upstream of the cleavage site and CstF to a downstream GU-rich element. At least one-quarter of all human poly(A) sites, however, lack the A(A/U)UAAA motif. We report that sequence-specific RNA binding of the human 3 processing factor CFI m can function as a primary determinant of poly ( The process of mRNA 3Ј end formation is not simply a perfunctory step in eukaryotic gene expression. At least one-half of all human genes are subject to alternative 3Ј processing (Iseli et al. 2002), the consequences of which may impact the protein coding capacity of the message, as well as its localization, translation efficiency, and stability (Edwalds-Gilbert et al. 1997). Moreover, poly(A) site selection may be modulated in a developmental and tissue-specific manner. In addition, pre-mRNA 3Ј processing contributes directly to transcription termination (Zorio and Bentley 2004), pre-mRNA splicing , and mRNA export (Hammell et al. 2002;Lei and Silver 2002). While the processing of constitutive poly(A) sites has been examined in considerable detail, the fundamental mechanisms responsible for the regulation of alternative poly(A) site selection have yet to be fully elucidated (Barabino and Keller 1999).The processing of the majority of human poly(A) sites involves the recognition of an AAUAAA or AUUAAA hexamer by CPSF, coupled with the binding of CstF to a GU-rich downstream element (DSE) (Zhao et al. 1999). The binding of CPSF and CstF appears to be sufficient, at least in vitro, to direct the assembly of a 3Ј processing complex composed of at least 14 different proteins. In vivo, however, the hexamer and DSE alone are unlikely to suffice for poly(A) site definition. The recognition of an authentic poly(A) site within a nascent RNA in vivo appears to rely on the "biosynthetic context" provided by the transcription elongation complex (Proudfoot 2004). At least nine 3Ј processing proteins are recruited to the transcription complex, at least in part through interactions with the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) (Calvo and Manley 2003). The colocalization of 3Ј processing factors, along with capping enzymes and spliceosome components, to the transcription elongation complex, allows for the cooperative interaction of these processing machineries within an "mRNA factory" (Zorio and Bentley 2004).Cotranscriptional recognition of a poly(A) site provides an elegant mechanism for the identification of a processing site demarcated by a limited set of sequence motifs. Yet the mechanisms that regulate the selection of alternative poly(A) sites within a pre-mRNA, or allow for the recognition of poly(A) sites that lack the canonical A(A/U)UAAA motif, are poorly understood. Seque...