1961
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(61)90008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical and theoretical importance of EEG rhythms corresponding to states of lowered vigilance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1
6

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
46
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to original conceptions by Bente [8] and Roth [9] , the following EEG vigilance stages can be observed during the transition from high alertness to relaxed wakefulness to drowsiness and finally sleep onset: • Stage 0: desynchronized non-alpha EEG in the absence of slow horizontal eye movements; found during an activated state (e.g. mental effort) • Stage A (with substages A1, A2, A3): EEG with dominant alpha activity corresponding to relaxed wakefulness, with decreasing vigilance, slight slowing of alpha activity and shift from occipital to more anterior cortices • Stage B1: non-alpha EEG with low amplitude (similar spectral composition as stage 0) but with presence of slow horizontal eye movements; drowsiness • Stage B2/3: non-alpha EEG with predominant theta/ delta activity, occasional occurrence of vertex waves; drowsiness and transition to sleep onset • Stage C: commencing with occurrence of sleep spindles or K complexes; sleep onset More recent studies on changes of EEG activity during the transition from active wakefulness to sleep onset endorse this classification [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] .…”
Section: Assessment Of Wakefulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to original conceptions by Bente [8] and Roth [9] , the following EEG vigilance stages can be observed during the transition from high alertness to relaxed wakefulness to drowsiness and finally sleep onset: • Stage 0: desynchronized non-alpha EEG in the absence of slow horizontal eye movements; found during an activated state (e.g. mental effort) • Stage A (with substages A1, A2, A3): EEG with dominant alpha activity corresponding to relaxed wakefulness, with decreasing vigilance, slight slowing of alpha activity and shift from occipital to more anterior cortices • Stage B1: non-alpha EEG with low amplitude (similar spectral composition as stage 0) but with presence of slow horizontal eye movements; drowsiness • Stage B2/3: non-alpha EEG with predominant theta/ delta activity, occasional occurrence of vertex waves; drowsiness and transition to sleep onset • Stage C: commencing with occurrence of sleep spindles or K complexes; sleep onset More recent studies on changes of EEG activity during the transition from active wakefulness to sleep onset endorse this classification [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] .…”
Section: Assessment Of Wakefulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the wake state can also be subdivided into several substages which, just like the sleep stages, can best be classified based on specific EEG features (see below). This knowledge exists since the 1960s, when these substages were first described [8,9] ; however, this has received much less attention compared to the sleep stages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used a midline bipolar electrode montage and presented clicks at 8-20 s intervals to subjects instructed to fall asleep and pay no attention to the sounds they heard. By visually inspecting the EEG traces, they then categorized each response epoch into one of nine stages of electroencephalographic vigilance according to the criteria of Roth (1961) and Bente (1964). They reported that the click-evoked responses peaks NI and P2 decline in amplitude with decrease in EEG vigilance (i.e., appearance of EEG changes associated with transition to sleep), and that a new N2 potential, with a shorter latency and more posterior scalp distribution, appears in the later sub-stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g., Roth, 1961;Berlyne & Lewis, 1963;Voronin & Sokolov, 1960). Berlyne & McDonnell (1965) studied duration of EEG de synchronization using eight pairs of stimuli in which the second differed from the first in terms of (1) irregularity of arrangement, (2) amount of material, (3) heterogeneity of elements, (4) irregularity of shape, (5) incongruity, (6) number of independent units, (7) assymmetry, and (8) random redistribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%