2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical impact of antibacterial prophylaxis and cycling antibiotics for febrile neutropenia in a hematological malignancy and transplantation unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of other studies showed that this strategy was effective in managing microbial resistance within individuals and populations, in particular for patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Preventive Strategies With a Continuous Antibiotic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of other studies showed that this strategy was effective in managing microbial resistance within individuals and populations, in particular for patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Preventive Strategies With a Continuous Antibiotic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously reported that the detection rate of Enterococcus strains in bacteremic isolates was significantly higher in patients with quinolone prophylaxis than in those without prophylaxis 22. Interestingly, the increase of bacteremic VRE isolates after quinolone prophylaxis was also reported from an institute in the United States 23. In the highly endemic areas of VRE, quinolone prophylaxis might affect the detection rates of their bacteremia in patients with febrile neutropenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The regimens of HDT in NHL patients are not the same between the two groups. The chronological differences may also affect the predominant strain at each transplantation [39]. We had a small number of CDIs (one skin infection, two pulmonary infiltrations with symptoms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%