2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(09)70012-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical performance of Invader® technology and SurePath® when detecting the presence of high-risk HPV cervical infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical sensitivity and NPV of Cervista for CIN3+ were 100 and 100%, respectively, and the clinical specificity and PPV for CIN3+ were 43 and 2.9%, respectively [47]. Although both large Cervista ASC-US triage studies published to date [44,47] showed excellent clinical sensitivity and NPV of Cervista for CIN3+, clinical specificity and PPV for CIN3+ in the study performed by Harvey et al [44] are quite poor and worrisome. Although the authors stated that it is likely that the PPV would be much higher if the statistical ana lysis was limited to women over 30 years of age [44], it is not clear why such analysis has not been performed.…”
Section: Cervista Hpv Hr Testmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The clinical sensitivity and NPV of Cervista for CIN3+ were 100 and 100%, respectively, and the clinical specificity and PPV for CIN3+ were 43 and 2.9%, respectively [47]. Although both large Cervista ASC-US triage studies published to date [44,47] showed excellent clinical sensitivity and NPV of Cervista for CIN3+, clinical specificity and PPV for CIN3+ in the study performed by Harvey et al [44] are quite poor and worrisome. Although the authors stated that it is likely that the PPV would be much higher if the statistical ana lysis was limited to women over 30 years of age [44], it is not clear why such analysis has not been performed.…”
Section: Cervista Hpv Hr Testmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although both large Cervista ASC-US triage studies published to date [44,47] showed excellent clinical sensitivity and NPV of Cervista for CIN3+, clinical specificity and PPV for CIN3+ in the study performed by Harvey et al [44] are quite poor and worrisome. Although the authors stated that it is likely that the PPV would be much higher if the statistical ana lysis was limited to women over 30 years of age [44], it is not clear why such analysis has not been performed. Age-stratified ana lysis of clinical performance of Cervista in the study performed by Einstein et al [47] showed clear influence of age on Cervista specificity.…”
Section: Cervista Hpv Hr Testmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations