1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-47744-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CO2 Laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the energy deposition increases, the sheath with the positive charge becomes stronger. This agrees with qualitative models [10,12] and a theoretical prediction [11].…”
Section: The Voltage-current Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the energy deposition increases, the sheath with the positive charge becomes stronger. This agrees with qualitative models [10,12] and a theoretical prediction [11].…”
Section: The Voltage-current Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Circuit stability can then be obtained by inserting a ballast resistor in series. This introduces additional power losses and lowers the efficiency [1,11]. An additional advantage of the RF discharge is the absence of a ballast resistor.…”
Section: Discharge Characteristics and The Stability Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO2 lasers can operate with 15 to 20% efficiency with 50 kilowatt average power for CW discharges and nearly 1 MW for gas-dynamic lasers [29]. For long pulses, they can operate at 1 kHz with several kW average power.…”
Section: Tw Laser Technologies Needing Major Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmittance of both mirrors at the 350-rim wavelength of the competing XeF(B-X) transition was higher than 85 ~. Because the experimental conditions and the pumping source intensity were well defined, this comparison was used to determine the coefficient ~ of proportionality between the refractive index variation and the initial density of XeF2 in relation (13). The experimentally measured laser energy was 225 m J, while the calculation performed at r = 2.9.10 -7 cm 3 yielded 220 mJ.…”
Section: Xef(c-a) Laser With 5-kj Input Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since experiments with small-scale lasers were used to determine the coeaicient e in (13), which is the only fitting parameter in the numerical code, we had to compare our computation results with the experimental data of other authors. It was desirable that their experimental conditions be different from ours.…”
Section: Xef(c-a) Laser With 90-kj Input Energymentioning
confidence: 99%