1981
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.49891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coccidian parasites (Protozoa, Apicomplexa) of carnivores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(227 reference statements)
4
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this argument we suggest that E. komareki, E. neomyi, and E. ropotamae are junior synonyms of E. chagasi. This concurs with a view held by Levine and Ivens (1979).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Based on this argument we suggest that E. komareki, E. neomyi, and E. ropotamae are junior synonyms of E. chagasi. This concurs with a view held by Levine and Ivens (1979).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We used young (6-to 8-wk-old) dogs in hopes of obtaining them before they developed a natural C. canis infection. Fortunately, none of our dogs came infected with C. canis because preinoculation fecal examinations for C. canis were negative and the timing of the prepatent period was consistent with the literature (Nemeséri, 1960;Lepp and Todd, 1974;Levine and Ivens, 1981). Prior infection is always a problem when working with coccidia in animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Little is known about the pathogenicity of C. neorivolta (Mahrt, 1967;Dubey and Mahrt, 1978) or C. burrowsi (Trayser and Todd, 1978;Rommel and Zielasko, 1981). Levine and Ivens (1981) suggested that strain differences in pathogenicity of C. canis could be present in dogs. Nemeséri (1960) found that 5 ϫ 10 3 oocysts of a Hungarian isolate of C. canis were not pathogenic for dogs, but an inoculum of 5 or 8 ϫ 10 4 oocysts produced clinical coccidiosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it appears that all eimerian parasites described from members of the genus Gazella lack oocyst residuum and polar granules, although oocysts of E. elegans Yakimoff, gousseff et rastegaieff, 1932 from G. gazella were described either having polar granules or not (Mantovani 1966, Pellérdy 1974, levine and ivens 1986. they all possess a sporocyst residuum (svanbaev 1979, levine and ivens 1986).…”
Section: Mohammed Et Al: Eimeria Dorcadis Redescription From Dorcas mentioning
confidence: 99%