1972
DOI: 10.3109/00206097209072593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cocktail party effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides a label to refer to oneself, for others to refer to, and is often associated with differential processing (e.g., cocktail party effect, e.g., Kuyper, 1972;Sayers & Cherry, 1957). Therefore we hypothesized that self-names would prime responses to self-face, indicative of a self-processing network that integrates information about the self from names and faces.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Effect Of Seeing Self-namesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a label to refer to oneself, for others to refer to, and is often associated with differential processing (e.g., cocktail party effect, e.g., Kuyper, 1972;Sayers & Cherry, 1957). Therefore we hypothesized that self-names would prime responses to self-face, indicative of a self-processing network that integrates information about the self from names and faces.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Effect Of Seeing Self-namesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires years of surgical experience to distinguish this difference in hammering sound, and even then this method can be imprecise. The human auditory system includes the ability to select what we hear by focusing on one particular sound while filtering out other auditory stimuli: the so-called "cocktail-party effect" [17]. However, this selective attention is primarily limited by our perception [18], which means surgeons unfamiliar with this method might be unable to appreciate the difference, and even experienced surgeons could mistakenly think they hear a good hammering sound even when the stem is not properly fitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primate studies have shown that visual area four processes visual guidance, including motion, depth, contrast, and brightness discrimination. Moreover, there is top-down processing of auditory guidance, which is indicated by phenomena such as the cocktail party effect [ 29 , 30 ]. This phenomenon involves focusing on a particular stimulus among a cacophony of conversations or background noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%