2020
DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2020.1832608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cognitive costs of managing emotions: A systematic review of the impact of emotional requirements on cognitive performance

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(116 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is essential to study the emotion management that occurs during young athletes’ training process. The findings of the present study verify which aspects of emotion management have a significant impact on the evaluation of benefits to young athletes [ [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ,]. This was accomplished through the development of an emotion management and sports growth scale for young athletes [ 14 , 15 ], to provide scientifically founded interventions and to guide the development of their emotions in their daily training process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, it is essential to study the emotion management that occurs during young athletes’ training process. The findings of the present study verify which aspects of emotion management have a significant impact on the evaluation of benefits to young athletes [ [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ,]. This was accomplished through the development of an emotion management and sports growth scale for young athletes [ 14 , 15 ], to provide scientifically founded interventions and to guide the development of their emotions in their daily training process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These coping behaviors may link differently to well-being, depending on the type of wellbeing indicator and the time unit adopted in the research design. Having to cope with a stressor means that employees not only have to invest resources to evaluate the stressor and come up with a course of action, but the deployed coping behavior is, to varying degrees, effortful in itself (e.g., Hofstee et al, 2020;Sheppes & Gross, 2011). For example, suppressing negative emotions after a conflict with a coworker requires constant monitoring of the emotional expression as the negative emotions triggered by the situation may not be resolved yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coping behaviors that aim to regulate cognitions, emotions, and behaviors require effort on behalf of the employee (Hofstee et al, 2020;Meurs & Perrewé, 2011). In this process, learning might be crucial as it allows employees to test and reflect on new or established strategies.…”
Section: The Paradox Of Coping Learning and Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because authenticity is defined as "unobstructed operation of one's true self" (Kernis & Goldman, 2006, p.19), and because emotion is an important part of the self (Tamir, 2016). In terms of cognitive costs, for example, it takes considerable cognitive efforts to regulate an emotion episode when it is fully developed, which crowds out individual's cognitive capacity to process information (Hofstee et al, 2021;Richards & Gross, 1999. A quick search of the effects of suppression in the literature reveals that it is easy to find suppression labelled as "unhealthy" or "maladaptive," and viewed as an indicator of poor emotional functioning (e.g., Aldao et al, 2010;Beblo et al, 2012;John & Gross, 2004).…”
Section: Suppression: a Maladaptive Strategy?mentioning
confidence: 99%