ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21-25 September 2013, Paphos, C 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Collaborative Work of Heritage: Open Challenges for CSCW

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaborative projects aimed at creating novel digital displays or interactives are frequently framed as participatory processes of co-creation involving museum staff, members of the audience (usually identified as relevant groups or communities) and researcher-designers. The theoretical background of, and rationale for various types of participatory configuration continue to be a subject of debate (Ciolfi, 2013;Ciolfi et al, 2016;Stuedahl et al, 2019). In initiatives inspired by a Participatory Design tradition (Schuler and Namioka, 1993) the focus is on understanding and finding expression for the perspectives of participating publics (Taxén, 2004;Dindler et al, 2010;Smith, Iversen and Dindler, 2011).…”
Section: Participatory Configurations In Academic Research With Glam mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative projects aimed at creating novel digital displays or interactives are frequently framed as participatory processes of co-creation involving museum staff, members of the audience (usually identified as relevant groups or communities) and researcher-designers. The theoretical background of, and rationale for various types of participatory configuration continue to be a subject of debate (Ciolfi, 2013;Ciolfi et al, 2016;Stuedahl et al, 2019). In initiatives inspired by a Participatory Design tradition (Schuler and Namioka, 1993) the focus is on understanding and finding expression for the perspectives of participating publics (Taxén, 2004;Dindler et al, 2010;Smith, Iversen and Dindler, 2011).…”
Section: Participatory Configurations In Academic Research With Glam mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of social interactions between visitors (e.g., families) for the museum experience [Falk and Dierking 2000;Falk and Dierking 2012;Kelly et al 2004;Perry 2012;Sanford et al 2007;vom Lehn et al 2007] and for museum learning [Ellenbogen et al 2004;Gutwill and Allen 2010;] is generally acknowledged. Many publications within visitor studies and HCI emphasize that the traditional dominant model of interaction for museum installations only supports the dialogue of a single user with the system, undermining the ability of others to participate ] and highlight the importance of supporting visitor groups [Ciolfi 2013;Ciolfi and Bannon 2002;Hornecker and Stifter 2006;Kelly 2002;vom Lehn et al 2007].…”
Section: Museum and Visitor Studies: Hands-on Or Minds-on Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,3]). Cultural Heritage is seen as a collaborative effort [2] and, in the FROG project, we aim to enhance the collaborative experience of small groups of people engaging with the location through the guidance of a robotic agent. For a short period of their visit, the FROG robot will recognize a group formation, engage them and guide them to a few locations of interest, offering novel ways to interact with content related to the site.…”
Section: Cscw 2014 • Video Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%