The final period of nuclear fission is discussed. We propose the following picture: Nuclear scission happens because of an hydrodynamic instability triggered by random surface vibrations. Thus the scissioning complex ruptures at random positions. Measured total kinetic energies point to the very relevance of the instability, while the randomness of rupture shows up in neutron emission data.
A Principal Difficulty with Present Fission TheoriesThere are presently two models for the description of nuclear fission [1,2]. They have been impressively modified and refined. For surveys see Wilets' booklet [3] and the references in an article by Wilkins et al. [4]. Despite their partial successes, both models run into specific disagreement with measurements, and this raises suspicion that both still miss an important aspect of the fission process. The statistical model [1,4] emphasizes the scission point. The two nascent fragments are imagined as two more or less dented pots in some contact. The pots are filled with nucleons which individually feel free to jump to and fro, but adhere statistical laws controlled by the level density. Crudely spoken, we havefor the probability P that one of the fragments incorporates A nucleons. The level density parameter a is approximately A~n/8 [5], A~, being the mass number of the compound nucleus and E~, its excitation energy. The dependence on A enters the righthand side of (1) . However, when the descent from saddle to scission point was treated in a somewhat more realistic fashion [7], the calculated mass distributions shrunk to dis-