1891
DOI: 10.1130/gsab-2-503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comanche Series of the Texas-Arkansas Region

Abstract: débris of the Burnet granite. They also vary in composition and thickness with the irregularities of the floor.West of the 98th meridian the Trinity sands are deposited unconformably upon the various beds of the " Triassic," or gypsiferous red beds, as seen * In places these pebbles are cemented into large masses of conglomerate, as at San Angelo, in Tom Green county, where it attains a great thickness and areal development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Glen Rose Formation was first described by Shumard (1860) as the Caprotina Limestone, and was given its present name by Hill (1891). Together, the Glen Rose and the underlying Hensel Sandstone form the last of two or three major transgressiveregressive cycles in the Trinity Group (Hayward & Brown 1967;Hendricks 1967;Stricklin et al 1971;Mancini & Scott 2006).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Glen Rose Formation was first described by Shumard (1860) as the Caprotina Limestone, and was given its present name by Hill (1891). Together, the Glen Rose and the underlying Hensel Sandstone form the last of two or three major transgressiveregressive cycles in the Trinity Group (Hayward & Brown 1967;Hendricks 1967;Stricklin et al 1971;Mancini & Scott 2006).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sections in this area were described in detail by Rodgers (1967), analyzed sedimentologically by Nagle (1968), Perkins (1979) and Bergan (1987Bergan ( , 1991, and integrated with subsurface stratigraphy by Pittman (1989). Here the Glen Rose Formation is divided into a lower and an upper member separated by a massive limestone unit called the Thorp Spring Member (Hill 1891). It reaches a total thickness of ca.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three transgressional "couplets" deposited sediments that formed (1) the Hosston and Sligo Formations (Imlay, 1940); (2) the Hammett Shale (Lozo and Stricklin, 1956) and the Cow Creek Limestone (Hill, 1901); and (3) the Hensell Sand (Hill, 1901) of the Pearsall Formation and the Glen Rose Limestone (Hill, 1891; (Rose, 1972;Maclay and Small, 1986). The basal nodular member of the Fort Terrett Formation (Maclay and Small, 1986) was deposited in a subtidal environment at the beginning of a marine transgressional cycle (Rose, 1972).…”
Section: Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three distinct "couplets" deposited sediments that formed (1) the Hosston and Sligo Formations (Imlay, 1940); (2) the Hammett Shale Member (Lozo and Stricklin, 1956) and the Cow Creek Limestone Member (Hill, 1901) of the Pearsall Formation (Imlay, 1940); and (3) the Hensell Sand Member (Hill, 1901) of the Pearsall Formation, as well as the lower and upper members of the Glen Rose Limestone (Hill, 1891).…”
Section: Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%