The Combination of Colistin and Doripenem Is Synergistic against Klebsiella pneumoniae at Multiple Inocula and Suppresses Colistin Resistance in an
            <i>In Vitro</i>
            Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

We characterized carbapenem resistance mechanisms among 12 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (referred to here as KPC K. pneumoniae) clinical isolates and evaluated their effects on the activity of 2-and 3-drug combinations of colistin, doripenem, and ertapenem. All isolates were resistant to ertapenem and doripenem; 75% (9/12) were resistant to colistin. Isolates belonged to the ST258 clonal group and harbored bla KPC-2 , bla SHV-12 , and bla TEM-1 . As determined by time-kill assays, doripenem (8 g/ml) and ertapenem (2 g/ml) were inactive against 92% (11/12) and 100% (12/12) of isolates, respectively. Colistin (2.5 g/ml) exerted some activity (range, 0.39 to 2.5 log 10 ) against 78% (7/9) of colistin-resistant isolates. Colistin-ertapenem, colistin-doripenem, and colistin-doripenem-ertapenem exhibited synergy against 42% (5/12), 50% (6/12), and 67% (8/12) of isolates, respectively. Expression of ompK35 and ompK36 porins correlated with each other (R 2 ‫؍‬ 0.80). Levels of porin expression did not correlate with colistin-doripenem or colistin-ertapenem synergy. However, synergy with colistin-doripenem-ertapenem was more likely against isolates with high porin expression than those with low expression (100% [8/8] versus 0% [0/4]; P ‫؍‬ 0.002). Moreover, bactericidal activity (area under the bacterial killing curve) against isolates with high porin expression was greater for colistin-doripenem-ertapenem than colistin-doripenem or colistin-ertapenem (P < 0.049). In conclusion, colistin-carbapenem combinations may provide optimal activity against KPC K. pneumoniae, including colistin-resistant isolates. Screening for porin expression may identify isolates that are most likely to respond to a triple combination of colistin-doripenem-ertapenem. In the future, molecular characterization of KPC K. pneumoniae isolates may be a practical tool for identifying effective combination regimens.

mentioning

confidence: 79%

Characterization of Porin Expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC)-Producing K. pneumoniae Identifies Isolates Most Susceptible to the Combination of Colistin and Carbapenems

Hong

Clancy

Cheng

et al. 2013

“…When tested on 4 colistin heteroresistant strains (19), similar PAPs where produced with imipenem-colistin combination therapy versus colistin alone. Deris et al (20) reported suppression of resistance with combination therapy versus 100% resistance development with monotherapy in 2/4 strains. Resistance suppression was also noted in another study on 3 P. aeruginosa strains (21).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Synergy of Polymyxins and Carbapenems

Zusman

Avni

Leibovici

et al. 2013

220

170

e Our objective was to examine the evidence of in vitro synergy of polymyxin-carbapenem combination therapy against Gramnegative bacteria (GNB). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. All studies examining in vitro interactions of antibiotic combinations consisting of any carbapenem with colistin or polymyxin B against any GNB were used. A broad search was conducted with no language, date, or publication status restrictions. Synergy rates, defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration index of <0.5 or a >2-log reduction in CFU, were pooled separately for time-kill, checkerboard, and Etest methods in a mixed-effect meta-analysis of rates. We examined whether the synergy rate depended on the testing method, type of antibiotic, bacteria, and resistance to carbapenems. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown. Thirty-nine published studies and 15 conference proceeding were included, reporting on 246 different tests on 1,054 bacterial isolates. In time-kill studies, combination therapy showed synergy rates of 77% (95% CI, 64 to 87%) for Acinetobacter baumannii, 44% (95% CI, 30 to 59%) for Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 50% (95% CI, 30 to 69%) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with low antagonism rates for all. Doripenem showed high synergy rates for all three bacteria. For A. baumannii, meropenem was more synergistic than imipenem, whereas for P. aeruginosa the opposite was true. Checkerboard and Etest studies generally reported lower synergy rates than time-kill studies. The use of combination therapy led to less resistance development in vitro. The combination of a carbapenem with a polymyxin against GNB, especially A. baumannii, is supported in vitro by high synergy rates, with low antagonism and less resistance development. These findings should be examined in clinical studies.

“…An IVM was used to simulate clinically relevant pharmacokinetic profiles for polymyxin B and colistin. The experimental setup for the IVM did not employ a filter and was identical to that used in previously published studies (24), except where described below. For each dosage regimen and bacterial strain, an elimination half-life (t 1/2 ) of 11.6 h and an average steady-state concentration (C ss,avg ) of 3 mg/liter were simulated in the IVM, guided by the results of previously published population PK studies in critically ill patients (5,8,9,25).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Colistin and Polymyxin B Dosage Regimens against Acinetobacter baumannii: Differences in Activity and the Emergence of Resistance

Cheah

Tsuji

et al. 2016

Self Cite

dInfections caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are a major public health problem, and polymyxins are often the last line of therapy for recalcitrant infections by such isolates. The pharmacokinetics of the two clinically used polymyxins, polymyxin B and colistin, differ considerably, since colistin is administered as an inactive prodrug that undergoes slow conversion to colistin. However, the impact of these substantial pharmacokinetic differences on bacterial killing and resistance emergence is poorly understood. We assessed clinically relevant polymyxin B and colistin dosage regimens against one reference and three clinical A. baumannii strains in a dynamic one-compartment in vitro model. A new mechanism-based pharmacodynamic model was developed to describe and predict the drug concentrations and viable counts of the total and resistant populations. Rapid attainment of target concentrations was shown to be critical for polymyxin-induced bacterial killing. All polymyxin B regimens achieved peak concentrations of at least 1 mg/liter within 1 h and caused >4 log 10 killing at 1 h. In contrast, the slow rise of colistin concentrations to 3 mg/liter over 48 h resulted in markedly reduced bacterial killing. A significant (4 to 6 log 10 CFU/ ml) amplification of resistant bacterial populations was common to all dosage regimens. The developed mechanism-based model explained the observed bacterial killing, regrowth, and resistance. The model also implicated adaptive polymyxin resistance as a key driver of bacterial regrowth and predicted the amplification of preexisting, highly polymyxin-resistant bacterial populations following polymyxin treatment. Antibiotic combination therapies seem the most promising option for minimizing the emergence of polymyxin resistance.