2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The combined influence of hydrophobicity, charge and molecular weight on natural organic matter removal by ion exchange and coagulation

Abstract: Three different source waters were investigated using virgin and pre-used anion exchange resins, coagulation, and ion exchange combined with coagulation (IEX&Coagulation). The hydrophobicity, size distribution and charge of natural organic matter (NOM) were used to evaluate its removal. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal by pre-used IEX resin was 67-79%. A consistent ratio of different hydrophobicity fractions was found in the removed DOC, while the proportion and quantity of the molecular weight fraction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the fact that the > 10,000 g/mol fraction blinds the adsorption sites for the < 350 g/mol MW compounds. This is consistent with that seen for SIX treatment of DOC from an upland source [37] and for GAC [3] such that these organic compounds are less readily removed compared to the same size fraction in the Riv source.…”
Section: Doc Molecular Weight Distribution Trendssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that the > 10,000 g/mol fraction blinds the adsorption sites for the < 350 g/mol MW compounds. This is consistent with that seen for SIX treatment of DOC from an upland source [37] and for GAC [3] such that these organic compounds are less readily removed compared to the same size fraction in the Riv source.…”
Section: Doc Molecular Weight Distribution Trendssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…SUVA breakthrough peaked at ∼250 BVs (Figure S8) and then stabilized at 1.2–1.3 C / C 0 for column 1 and 1.3–1.4 C / C 0 for columns 1 + 2. The differences in the removal of UVA 254 vs. TOC as well as in rates of removal over the course of treatment could be attributed to the heterogeneous nature of NOM, with different fractions exhibiting distinct properties (e.g., hydrophobicity, charge density, and molecular weight) affecting removal by AEX resin. , The UVA 254 -absorbing NOM fraction is attributed to acidic, aromatic substances and is associated with disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation. , The relatively greater UVA 254 breakthrough observed indicates that this fraction was poorly removed compared to overall TOC, corresponding with increased SUVA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall mass transfer resistance is the sum of the resistances caused by the film, particle and the exchange of ions itself (SenGupta, 2017). The resin age and previous organic matter saturation can influence these factors, in turn affecting the uptake rate of organic matter (Finkbeiner et al, 2020). It was hypothesised that pore blockage caused by continuous use could hinder the uptake of organic matter using resins of increasing age, despite frequent regeneration.…”
Section: Organic Matter Adsorption Kinetics and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%