2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33386-6_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The COMICS Tool – Computing Minimal Counterexamples for DTMCs

Abstract: This report presents the tool COMICS 1.0, which performs model checking and generates counterexamples for DTMCs. For an input DTMC, COMICS computes an abstract system that carries the model checking information and uses this result to compute a critical subsystem, which induces a counterexample. This abstract subsystem can be refined and concretized hierarchically. The tool comes with a command-line version as well as a graphical user interface that allows the user to interactively influence the refinement pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we evaluate our MILP formulations and heuristics on a number of DTMC and MDP benchmarks from the Prism benchmark-suite [57,58]. We compare our results with the tool Comics [49], which implements heuristic approaches to compute small subsystems for DTMCs. It has two modes: the local search extends a given subsystem by short paths that carry much probability, whereas the global search searches for the next most probable path from the initial state to goal, and adds it to the subsystem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we evaluate our MILP formulations and heuristics on a number of DTMC and MDP benchmarks from the Prism benchmark-suite [57,58]. We compare our results with the tool Comics [49], which implements heuristic approaches to compute small subsystems for DTMCs. It has two modes: the local search extends a given subsystem by short paths that carry much probability, whereas the global search searches for the next most probable path from the initial state to goal, and adds it to the subsystem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model checking MDPs in the presence of multiple objectives has been studied in [36,38]. Heuristic approaches for computing small witnessing subsystems in DTMCs have been proposed in [5,7,48,50,51] and implemented in the tool Comics [49]. Witnessing subsystems in MDPs have been considered in [6,9] and [19], which focuses on succinctly representing witnessing schedulers.…”
Section: Property Certificate Dimension Certificate Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, we take a weighted-sum approach for solving the multi-objective optimization problem (9). Assuming that Π S = {π 1 , π 2 , π 3 , .…”
Section: Counterexample-guided Apprenticeship Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it does, then it will be added to Π S . Otherwise, a counterexample generator, such as COMICS [9], is used to generate a (minimal) counterexample cex πω , which will be added to CEX. σ, α ∈ (0, 1) ← Error bound σ and step length α for the parameter k; 6: Initialization: 7:…”
Section: Counterexample-guided Apprenticeship Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also changed the counterexample selection scheme to potentially lower the complexity. Furthermore, we developed the supervisor synthesis software in C++ using counterexample generation tool COMICS [24] and L* learning library libalf [25]. This paper is divided into five parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%