The (Common) Sense of KM

Koenig, Michael E. D.; Jank, David A.

doi:10.1142/s0219649212500098

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead, they argue that KM exhibits attributes of a healthy academic domain with no apparent anomalies (Curado et al, 2011;Grant, 2011;Lee and Chen, 2012;Serenko et al, 2011b;. Recently, Koenig and Jank (2012) also concluded that KM has established itself as a major component of managerial practices. Therefore, it is more likely that KM has the potential to become a recognized field of science in the future.…”

Section: Implications and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline

Serenko

2013

Journal of Knowledge Management

139

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose-The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis of prior scientometric research of the knowledge management (KM) field. Design/methodology/approach-A total of 108 scientometric studies of the KM discipline were subjected to meta-analysis techniques. Findings-The overall volume of scientometric KM works has been growing, reaching up to ten publications per year by 2012, but their key findings are somewhat inconsistent. Most scientometric KM research is published in non-KM-centric journals. The KM discipline has deep historical roots. It suffers from a high degree of over-differentiation and is represented by dissimilar research streams. The top six most productive countries for KM research are the USA, the UK, Canada, Germany, Australia, and Spain. KM exhibits attributes of a healthy academic domain with no apparent anomalies and is progressing towards academic maturity. Practical implications-Scientometric KM researchers should use advanced empirical methods, become aware of prior scientometric research, rely on multiple databases, develop a KM keyword classification scheme, publish their research in KM-centric outlets, focus on rigorous research of the forums for KM publications, improve their cooperation, conduct a comprehensive study of individual and institutional productivity, and investigate interdisciplinary collaboration. KM-centric journals should encourage authors to employ under-represented empirical methods and conduct meta-analysis studies and should discourage conceptual publications, especially the development of new frameworks. To improve the impact of KM research on the state of practice, knowledge dissemination channels should be developed. Originality/value-This is the first documented attempt to conduct a meta-analysis of scientometric research of the KM discipline.

show abstract

Section: Implications and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline

Serenko

2013

Journal of Knowledge Management

139

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Apesar de sua evolução precoce, a GC ainda é um construto de maturação gradual (KOENIG;JANK, 2012;BONTIS, 2013;, para o qual se torna vital contribuir com a sua consolidação, inclusive, no âmbito da administração pública em educação, sendo esta a contribuição científica da pesquisa.…”

Section: Conclusõesunclassified

Gestão do Conhecimento em Universidade Pública do Semiárido Nordestino (Knowledge Management in Public University of Northeastern Semiarid)

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O objetivo deste estudo foi mensurar a percepção de administradores em educação sobre a Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) nos processos táticos e estratégicos de uma universidade pública, cujo principal recurso é o conhecimento acerca da região Semiárida do Nordeste brasileiro. Trata-se de uma pesquisa quantitativa, de caráter descritivo e com características tecnológicas, que foi operacionalizada por meio de uma survey. Utilizou-se o Diagnóstico de Gestão do Conhecimento de Bukowitz e Williams (2002) e os indicadores propostos por Brito, Oliveira e Castro (2012) como modelos estruturais. Os dados foram levantados por meio de questionários e, em seguida, tratados em planilhas eletrônicas. Os resultados sinalizaram que há um esforço da instituição para a implantação do modelo de organizações de aprendizagem, e que, portanto, ela deixou de enfrentar o exercício da gestão somente por meio da realização de projetos pedagógicos. Além disso, a universidade consegue preparar cidadãos e parceiros para atuarem em favor do Estado na elaboração e na implementação de soluções para os problemas sociais, ambientais, políticos e econômicos da região Semiárida brasileira.

show abstract

“…Affective commitment is of particular relevance to the emerging knowledge economy and to the knowledge firms (Casimir et al 2012), which entails that the study of Knowledge Management should broadly be done at the level of the Company which is the microlevel where Knowledge Management becomes critical. Another important corollary is that as the economy becomes more based on information and knowledge and upon information and knowledge-based products, the diffusion of technological and economic capability around the globe becomes more and more rapid (Koenig and Jank 2012). It has also been reported that 'many of the leading KM theories and practices recognize the importance of social interaction and communications in knowledge sharing and creation.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Paradigms of Knowledge Management

Pandey

2016

Studies in Systems, Decision and Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The series "Studies in Systems, Decision and Control" (SSDC) covers both new developments and advances, as well as the state of the art, in the various areas of broadly perceived systems, decision making and control-quickly, up to date and with a high quality. The intent is to cover the theory, applications, and perspectives on the state of the art and future developments relevant to systems, decision making, control, complex processes and related areas, as embedded in the fields of engineering, computer science, physics, economics, social and life sciences, as well as the paradigms and methodologies behind them. The series contains monographs, textbooks, lecture notes and edited volumes in systems, decision making and control spanning the areas of Cyber-Physical Systemsother. Of particular value to both the contributors and the readership are the short publication timeframe and the world-wide distribution and exposure which enable both a wide and rapid dissemination of research output.More information about this series at

show abstract

The (Common) Sense of KM

Cited by 9 publications

References 7 publications

Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline

Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline

Gestão do Conhecimento em Universidade Pública do Semiárido Nordestino (Knowledge Management in Public University of Northeastern Semiarid)

Paradigms of Knowledge Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About