1987
DOI: 10.3758/bf03210487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The communication of dynamics between musicians and listeners through musical performance

Abstract: Musicians perform music according to their own interpretations. How does a player realize his/her interpretation of a piece of music in the form of tones? How is hislher intention understood by a listener? In this study, the relationships among the following were investigated quantitatively: (1) the dynamics of a piece of music that professional performers intend to convey to listeners; (2) the intensity of tones produced by the performers; and (3) the listeners' perception of the dynamics of performances, as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the correct metrical interpretation may be found by weighting each event in a sequence according to perceived cues of accenting. However, duration and intensity cues in both music composition and performance are influenced by many factors in addition to meter, including phrase structure, melodic importance, and articulation (Nakamura, 1987;Palmer, 1988;Sloboda, 1983). Often the acoustic cues to meter are ambiguous, interactive, or simply absent; yet listeners can still determine the meter.…”
Section: Perceptual Cues To Musical Metermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the correct metrical interpretation may be found by weighting each event in a sequence according to perceived cues of accenting. However, duration and intensity cues in both music composition and performance are influenced by many factors in addition to meter, including phrase structure, melodic importance, and articulation (Nakamura, 1987;Palmer, 1988;Sloboda, 1983). Often the acoustic cues to meter are ambiguous, interactive, or simply absent; yet listeners can still determine the meter.…”
Section: Perceptual Cues To Musical Metermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performers highlight interpretations of musical structure through the use of expressive variations in frequency, timing, intensity, and timbre (cf. Clarke, 1988;Nakamura, 1987;Palmer, 1997;Repp, 1992;Sloboda, 1983). For example, different performers can interpret the same musical piece with different phrase structures (Palmer, 1989(Palmer, , 1992; each performance reflects slowing down or pausing at events that are intended as phrase endings, similar to phrase-final lengthening in speech.…”
Section: Temporal Fluctuations In Music Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In performance, an intended metrical inter-pretation may be communicated by marking the primary accents, most often through variations in intensity or duration (Palmer, 1989;Shaffer, Clarke, &Todd, 1985;S}oboda, 1983). However, duration and intensity cues are influenced in both composition and performance by many factors in addition to meter (Nakamura, 1987;Palmer, 1988;Shaffer & Todd, 1987). Often these cues are ambiguous, interactive, or simply absent; yet the listener still determines the meter correctly.…”
Section: Perceptual Cues For Metermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidt (cited in Fraisse, 1956), who asked subjects to tap a regular beat, observed spontaneous grouping with a regular cyclic variation in intensity. The pertinence of dynamics in the perception of music has been demonstrated by Nakamura (1987), who asked musicians to play a piece of music with a crescendo, which was later correctly interpreted by nonmusicians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%