Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02630-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Company Directors’ Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…between the committee and the local teams, the delay in CSR campaign approvals, the committee's distance from local teams, and their approach to CSR as a monetary contribution and so on could all stem from a poorly constituted committee, rather than the concept of committee itself. As Gustavson (2009) suggests, committees needs a diverse group of members with a wide range of experiences, values and risk perceptions to ensure a balance of opinions, which would help problem solving and implementation of proposed CSR plans. Ibrahim, Howard, and Angelidis (2003) suggest that a committee must also comprise both outsiders and insiders as the outsiders are less economically driven and more focused on philanthropy.…”
Section: Ineffectiveness Of Csr Committeesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…between the committee and the local teams, the delay in CSR campaign approvals, the committee's distance from local teams, and their approach to CSR as a monetary contribution and so on could all stem from a poorly constituted committee, rather than the concept of committee itself. As Gustavson (2009) suggests, committees needs a diverse group of members with a wide range of experiences, values and risk perceptions to ensure a balance of opinions, which would help problem solving and implementation of proposed CSR plans. Ibrahim, Howard, and Angelidis (2003) suggest that a committee must also comprise both outsiders and insiders as the outsiders are less economically driven and more focused on philanthropy.…”
Section: Ineffectiveness Of Csr Committeesmentioning
confidence: 99%