We would like to thank the interventional cardiologists/readers for their comments on our review "Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with active bleeding or high bleeding risk-Review'' that was published recently in this journal (1).We agree with the comments that in case of myocardial infarction (MI) during the peri-operative period of non-cardiac surgery, the best strategy is to perform primary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) without stenting. The reason is that with this strategy, we would have to give only unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin during PTCA without the need for P2Y12 inhibition (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor). The goal is to achieve a TIMI 3 flow with a residual stenosis of <5%.In the letter, the interventional cardiologists/readers also presented a case of peri-operative MI requiring thrombectomy. İt is imperative to use the aspiration catheter because of the heavy thrombotic burden in the setting of an acute stent thrombosis. How about thrombectomy by the aspiration catheter in patients who undergo only plain PTCA? A literature search did not reveal any results from randomized trials or even anecdotal case reports. Even so, when discussing thrombectomy in the setting of perioperative MI, there are 2 questions to answer. First, can thrombectomy alone without PTCA or stenting recanalize the infarct-related artery (IRA) to a TIMI 3 flow? Second, how does one prevent enlargement of the thrombus in a patient with an acute MI with a very short ischemic time (<15 minutes) so that there is less need for aspiration thrombectomy and lower incidence of systemic or distal embolization caused by the aspiration thrombectomy procedure itself?First, in 2 reports, 1% of patients with AMI had the IRA recanalized to achieve a TIMI 3 flow after lone aspiration thrombectomy (2, 3). So in reality, thrombectomy alone could be performed without involving PTCA or stenting in a very small percentage of patients (1%). The decision for thrombectomy may require the deployment of a proximal or distal protection device because of the high incidence of systemic and distal embolization (~14%) following thrombectomy and PTCA and/or stenting or the deployment of the distal protection device itself (4, 5).Second, how do we prevent the patient from having a heavier thrombotic burden in a peri-operative MI? Fresh thrombus was present in 60% of patients while an older thrombus was present in 40%. The incidence of distal embolization was higher (18 versus 12%, p=0.01) than in those with fresh thrombus (6). Recently, I had a patient who had undergone 9 minutes of Bruce protocol without chest pain. Five minutes into recovery, the patient developed chest pain with ST segment elevation. An Acute Response Team (ART) code was called, and immediately the patient was given 5000 units of UFH and one aspirin to chew. In less than 10 minutes, the pain subsided and at that time the cardiac catheterization laboratory was ready for the patient. A coronary angiogram showed a tight 80% lesion in the right coronary artery. The bo...