2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative kinetic analysis of the non-isothermal crystallization process of Eu3+ doped Zn2SiO4 powders prepared via polymer induced sol–gel method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both functions show similar shapes for the dependence on the heating rate β. This behaviour of y(α) and z(α) curves with varying of β indicates the characteristic of complex kinetic crystallization [23]. The y(α) function shows an obvious high-α side shoulder suggesting the growth of crystallization is three-dimensional growth from bulk nuclei [24].…”
Section: Crystallization Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Both functions show similar shapes for the dependence on the heating rate β. This behaviour of y(α) and z(α) curves with varying of β indicates the characteristic of complex kinetic crystallization [23]. The y(α) function shows an obvious high-α side shoulder suggesting the growth of crystallization is three-dimensional growth from bulk nuclei [24].…”
Section: Crystallization Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, more structured shape of TG/DTA curves shows that thermal behavior of sol-gel derived materials is more complex compared to mixed metal-citric acid ones. According to our previous study on the crystallization of phosphor materials prepared by sol-gel method [25], one should expect that materials crystallize in a two-step process. In the primary crystallization stage nonconstant radial growth rate is present, while in the second stage twodimensional crystal growth occurs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can be concluded that the JMA model is not appropriate for the study of crystallization kinetics for the alloy under investigation. Also, the general results αp ∞ values are lower than 0.632 indicating a complicated and accelerated crystallization techniques [66]. Such crystallization behavior could be particularly characteristic in the evidential SB (M, N) method.…”
Section: The Validity Of Jma or Sb Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Such crystallization behavior could be particularly characteristic in the evidential SB (M, N) method. M and N are two main parameters that identify the unique influence of the accelerator and decomposition components of the crystallization operating [66]. The mentioned two parameters are computed in terms of M …”
Section: The Validity Of Jma or Sb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%