2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.icl.0000146323.18919.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparison of Overnight Lens Modalities (COLM) Study

Abstract: The NEI RQL-42 may be able to detect differences in refractive quality of life between two contact lens treatment groups for the dependence-on-correction scale. Paragon CRT and CIBA Vision Focus NIGHT and DAY lenses produced similar high- and low-contrast visual acuity in this study. A sample size of 126 subjects per group is required to find a 10-unit difference on the NEI RQL-42.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The improvement we found in the dependence on correction subscale is an interesting result that was first reported by Ritchey et al in a study that randomized patients to wear either CRT lenses or Focus Night and Day lenses (CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA) on a 30-day continuous-wear basis. 7 In their study, the eight patients in the CRT arm showed a significant improvement in the dependence on correction subscale after 3 months of wearing CRT lenses when compared with their previous mode of correction. This finding suggests that although patients must wear their CRT lenses while asleep to maintain their treatment effect, they may not feel as dependent on their correction because they do not have to wear them while doing their day-to-day activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 The improvement we found in the dependence on correction subscale is an interesting result that was first reported by Ritchey et al in a study that randomized patients to wear either CRT lenses or Focus Night and Day lenses (CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA) on a 30-day continuous-wear basis. 7 In their study, the eight patients in the CRT arm showed a significant improvement in the dependence on correction subscale after 3 months of wearing CRT lenses when compared with their previous mode of correction. This finding suggests that although patients must wear their CRT lenses while asleep to maintain their treatment effect, they may not feel as dependent on their correction because they do not have to wear them while doing their day-to-day activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3,4 To our knowledge, there have only been two studies published using the NEI-RQL-42 to evaluate the effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life. [5][6][7] In modern overnight orthokeratology, a temporary reduction of myopia is achieved by reshaping the cornea using a reverse geometry rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lens. Corneal refractive therapy (CRT; Paragon Vision Sciences, Mesa, AZ) was the first contact lens procedure approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for overnight contact lens corneal reshaping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 90 per cent of the interviewed patients ranked the treatment as good or very good. Previous surveys using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life (NEI‐RQL 42) instrument to evaluate the levels of patient satisfaction with overnight ortho‐k showed that there were either no differences 31 or better 25 quality‐of‐life indices in overnight ortho‐k compared to 30‐day continuous wear silicone hydrogel lenses or daily disposable hydrogel lenses, respectively. This indicates that overnight ortho‐k is well accepted as a means for myopic correction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NEI-RQL-42 is a disease-specific VRQoL instrument that was designed specifically to assess the impact of refractive error and its correction on vision-related functioning. The NEI-RQL-42 has been shown to distinguish between patients with different types of refractive error and with varying forms of refractive correction [1,2], and it was also reported to be responsive to changes in VRQoL resulting from keratorefractive surgery [3][4][5][6], correction of astigmatism and presbyopia with contact lenses [7,8] and orthokeratology [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%