2003
DOI: 10.1163/138946303775160250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Article 17 also explains that a case cannot be accepted after being investigated by the concerned country and the perpetrator's persecution was refused or executed. However, the complementary principle does not affect the jurisdiction of the ICC but regulates situations when its exercise is mandated (Benzing, 2003).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Situation In Myanmarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Article 17 also explains that a case cannot be accepted after being investigated by the concerned country and the perpetrator's persecution was refused or executed. However, the complementary principle does not affect the jurisdiction of the ICC but regulates situations when its exercise is mandated (Benzing, 2003).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Situation In Myanmarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, una lectura sistemática de los artículos 1, 15, 17 y 53 del ER permite concluir claramente que la CPI no puede ejercer su competencia sobre situaciones o casos que sean inadmisibles. De allí que sea necesario evaluar los dos ejes vinculantes de la admisibilidad de una eventual situación relativa al Paro Nacional: (A) la complementariedad (Benzing, 2003) y (B) la gravedad suficiente (Schabas & El Zeidy, 2016).…”
Section: La Admisibilidad De La Situación Relativa Al Paro Nacionalunclassified
“…2008a; Ambos 2008, 746). De hecho, con relación a este principio, el Estatuto refleja el compromiso diplomático de reconciliar dos valores diferentes: por un lado, la soberanía de los Estados, siendo uno de sus rasgos fundamentales el ejercicio de la jurisdicción penal; y, de otro lado, el desarrollo efectivo de la justicia penal internacional (Benzing 2003;Kyriakakis 2008, 123).…”
Section: A) Argumentos De Derecho Internacional Públicounclassified