The concept of ‘palimpsest’ in a reconceptualization of biodiversity conservation

Abstract

Summary The concept of the Anthropocene has highlighted the significant global impact of human activities on ecological systems on a geological scale (Crutzen 2002). This concept has come to significantly influence a scientific and political agenda orientated towards documenting and denouncing multiple negative anthropogenic factors that have led to global change. Nevertheless, not all large-scale environmental transformations by human societies have been intrinsically destructive. Many indigenous communities in the Neotropics, Palearctic, sub-Saharan Africa, North America, Indo-Malaya and Australasia have radically – albeit often constructively – modified the physical and biotic conditions of the ecological systems that they inhabit (Ellis 2015). It is necessary to revise the assumption that human actions always degrade the environment, through a reconceptualization that we have previously called ‘anthropogenesis’ (Rivera-Núñez et al. 2020). Instead of the naïve portrayal of the ‘good Anthropocene’ (Hamilton 2015, Fremaux & Barry 2019), anthropogenesis seeks to enrich the biodiversity debate with the historical human expressions of constructed environments that the conservation-focused ‘Edenic sciences’ and the ‘pristine syndrome’ (Robbins & Moore 2013) tend to ignore, or ‘Anthropo-not-see’ (de la Cadena 2019). The objective of this comment paper is to urge the academic community, grassroots organizations and governments to employ a concept of ‘palimpsest’ (from the Ancient Greek for ‘again scraped’, implying that something is scraped clear ready to be used again) in the reconceptualization of biodiversity conservation from a historical perspective that implements research and policy agendas that incorporate the human propensity for environmental construction in a deeper and more inclusive manner.

The impact of ancient Mesoamerican cities on long-term environmental sustainability: the view from historical ecology

“…Historical ecologists have demonstrated empirically that intermediate scale "disturbances" can result in changes in biota that persist over the longue dureé (Baleé, 2006). These disturbances include a) controlled use of fire, b) modification of hydrological systems, c) mineral and biological enrichment of soils, d) domestication and diversification of plant and animal species, e) changes in species distribution and abundance, f) co-evolutionary histories with wildlife, and g) the complete shaping of useful oligarchic meta-landscapes through complex successive vegetation management (Rivera-Núñez and Fargher, 2021).…”

The Urban River Syndrome: Achieving Sustainability Against a Backdrop of Accelerating Change

“…Habitat stewardship and species husbandry have been conducted by indigenous peoples for millennia [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. To achieve a sustainable future, these will need to be incorporated as a central tenet of the Anthropocene together with a radical change in environmental hygiene in general.…”