2017
DOI: 10.5751/es-09310-220231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: a new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability

Abstract: ABSTRACT. After tracing the antecedents of the concept and considering its intersection in social innovation research, we put forward the argument that the Anthropocene concept points to three areas of thought that are strategically imperative and must be accelerated if social innovation theory and practice is to prove transformative and respond to the challenges associated with the Anthropocene. First, we contend that the current debate on social innovation for sustainability lacks a deeper focus on human-env… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
146
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
146
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They call for a more dynamic, multigame perspective in which the structure is not fixed but dependent upon agency, a point that is especially pertinent to transformative social innovators who seek to challenge dominant institutions. Olsson et al (2017) argue that conceiving the current geological epoch as the Anthropocene represents a game-changer for social innovation research, calling for a perspective that addresses the linkages between social systems and ecosystems with a time frame for exploring change that is commensurate with the imperative of the Anthropocene.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Game-changers In Transformative Social Innovmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They call for a more dynamic, multigame perspective in which the structure is not fixed but dependent upon agency, a point that is especially pertinent to transformative social innovators who seek to challenge dominant institutions. Olsson et al (2017) argue that conceiving the current geological epoch as the Anthropocene represents a game-changer for social innovation research, calling for a perspective that addresses the linkages between social systems and ecosystems with a time frame for exploring change that is commensurate with the imperative of the Anthropocene.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Game-changers In Transformative Social Innovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the geographical diversity, from Africa, Europe, and India, to Latin America and North America, there is even more variety in terms of problem domains, ranging from specific functional systems, e.g., energy, food, or housing, to broader cross-domain issues such as the science-society interface, urban development, and climate change. Furthermore, there is diversity in temporality, varying from game-changers as single events, e.g., the 2014-2015 Belgian electricity blackout in Pel et al (2016), to developments spanning a few years, e.g., World War II in Westley et al (2016) or economic crises in Loorbach et al (2016) and Gordon et al (2017), to much slower, long-term developments, such as climate change in Campos et al (2016) or the Anthropocene in Olsson et al (2017).…”
Section: Empirical Examples Of Game-changers and (Transformative) Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transformations towards sustainability involve, for example, also changing practices, routines, and habits of both producers and consumers (e.g., [84][85][86][87]) and other types of innovation beyond technological solutions (e.g., [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95]). Moreover, in order to achieve systemic changes, multiple sustainability dimensions (e.g., economic, institutional, cultural, organizational, etc.)…”
Section: Innovation Systems: Merits and Limits In The Light Of Transfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of authors linking the two explicitly and emphasizing the transformative potential of social innovations for a sustainable development is only slowly rising (cf. Haxeltine et al, 2013;McNeill, 2013;Parra, 2013;Olson et al, 2017). This leads also to an inconsistent terminology and a missing definition of the concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%