1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0197-3975(97)00010-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conflicts, shortcomings, and implications of the urban land management system in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only in the year 2000 did the suggested roads expansion plan began in the area. These findings partly concur with Olima (1997) and Klopp (2012), who argue that non-utilization of land in Kenya was caused by inefficient land administration and management, which could relate to approaches in natural resource development by an existing political regime. In addition, inadequate economic capacity by individuals, companies and governments may impede utilization and development of land resources, even with clear investment ideas and plans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, only in the year 2000 did the suggested roads expansion plan began in the area. These findings partly concur with Olima (1997) and Klopp (2012), who argue that non-utilization of land in Kenya was caused by inefficient land administration and management, which could relate to approaches in natural resource development by an existing political regime. In addition, inadequate economic capacity by individuals, companies and governments may impede utilization and development of land resources, even with clear investment ideas and plans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These issues are similar to those in other developing countries, as exemplified in the case of Kenya (Olima, 1997); Tanzania (Kironde, 1997); Zimbabwe (Rakodi, 1996); India (Sivam, 2002); Asian developing countries (Menezes, 1988; see also Koppel, 1993); and Latin America (de Soto, 2000;de Soto and Litan, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In Kenya, public land management seems to have favoured those who are politically, socially, and economically most powerful (Olima, 1997). In fact, the Kenyan government has been extremely slow to act decisively on issues of the deficiencies of and irregularities in public land allocation (p. 331).…”
Section: Theoretical Context and A Brief Overview Of Urban Land Develmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mlolongo, Kenya, land was forcefully seized by councilors in 2000 and allocated to individuals connected to them, following the role of patronage. Called ngwata, this type of land allocation process is similar to grabbing, implying the irregular or illegitimate acquisition of land (United Republic of Kenya 2001Kenya , 2004Klopp 2000;Olima 1997). The Municipal Council of Mavoko, in which Mlolongo falls, issued temporary occupation licenses to plot benefi ciaries and encouraged them to form an association.…”
Section: The "Ngwata" System Of Land Conversion In Mlolongo Town Of Mmentioning
confidence: 99%