2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-014-0604-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conformal loop ensemble nesting field

Abstract: The conformal loop ensemble CLE κ with parameter 8/3 < κ < 8 is the canonical conformally invariant measure on countably infinite collections of noncrossing loops in a simply connected domain. We show that the number of loops surrounding an ε-ball (a random function of z and ε) minus its expectation converges almost surely as ε → 0 to a random conformally invariant limit in the space of distributions, which we call the nesting field. We generalize this result by assigning i.i.d. weights to the loops, and we tr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining (8), (14) and (15), we obtain (12). There is a variance analogue of the elementary renewal theorem, see e.g.…”
Section: Define Eventmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Combining (8), (14) and (15), we obtain (12). There is a variance analogue of the elementary renewal theorem, see e.g.…”
Section: Define Eventmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Also sample an independent uniformly distributed sign σ Γ P t´1, 1u. Then, for a well-chosen constant λ ą 0 (equal to a π{8 in our normalisation of the GFF), the field ÿ ΓPCLE4 1 IntpΓq pφ Γ`σΓ 2λq is a Gaussian free field φ D in D with zero boundary conditions (see also [36,26]). In this coupling the CLE 4 loops can be interpreted as level lines of the continuum Gaussian free field φ D on D and are in fact deterministic functions of the GFF ( [25], see also [2]).…”
Section: By Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is straightforward to see that C and α (which in principle depend on κ) may be chosen uniformly for κ ∈ [4, 6] (say). Indeed, it follows from the proof in [MWW15] that they depend only on the law of the log conformal radius of the outermost loop containing 0 for a CLE κ in D, and this varies continuously in κ, [SSW09]. Hence, the result follows by letting R → ∞ in Lemma 2.27 and noting that the second smallest loop containing D is contained in rD with arbitarily high probability as r → ∞, uniformly in κ.…”
Section: Whole Plane Cle and Conclusion Of The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For fixed κ ∈ [4, 8), let Γ C , Γ RD denote whole plane CLE κ and CLE κ on RD respectively. The key to this lemma is Theorem 9.1 in [MWW15], which states (in particular) that Γ RD rapidly converges to Γ C in the following sense. For some C, α > 0, Γ RD and Γ C can be coupled so that for any r > 0 and R > r, with probability at least 1 − C(R/r) −α , there is a conformal map ϕ from some D ⊃ (R/r) 1/4 D to D ⊃ (R/r) 1/4 D, which maps the nested loops of Γ RD -starting with the smallest containing rD -to the corresponding nested loops of Γ C , and has low distortion in the sense that |ϕ (z)…”
Section: Whole Plane Cle and Conclusion Of The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%