2015
DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1066301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Confusion of Fear and Surprise: A Developmental Study of the Perceptual-Attentional Limitation Hypothesis Using Eye Movements

Abstract: The goal of the present study was to test the Perceptual-Attentional Limitation Hypothesis in children and adults by manipulating the distinctiveness between expressions and recording eye movements. Children 3-5 and 9-11 years old as well as adults were presented pairs of expressions and required to identify a target emotion. Children 3-5 years old were less accurate than those 9-11 years old and adults. All children viewed pictures longer than adults but did not spend more time attending to the relevant cues.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hit rates were once again observed to improve with longer expression display times (all p < .001; see Table 1 and Figure 2), and fear expressions were properly labeled at rates above chance with both the 67 and 500 ms display times. However, inconsistent with prior literature (Chamberland et al, 2017;Gagnon et al, 2010;Gosselin et al, 1995;Gosselin & Simard, 1999;Jack et al, 2009; Roy-Charland et al, 2014, 2015, fear expressions were not confused with "surprise" after corrections for multiple comparisons.…”
Section: Fear Expressionscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Hit rates were once again observed to improve with longer expression display times (all p < .001; see Table 1 and Figure 2), and fear expressions were properly labeled at rates above chance with both the 67 and 500 ms display times. However, inconsistent with prior literature (Chamberland et al, 2017;Gagnon et al, 2010;Gosselin et al, 1995;Gosselin & Simard, 1999;Jack et al, 2009; Roy-Charland et al, 2014, 2015, fear expressions were not confused with "surprise" after corrections for multiple comparisons.…”
Section: Fear Expressionscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, in our case, fear was mostly confused with surprise. The difficulty in distinguishing between fear and surprise is in fact supported by the literature on adults’ and children’s recognition of these emotions, and in most cases this challenge is attributed to people’s limited attention to the position of the eyebrows, which is a key in distinguishing between these emotions [ 58 ] (and being an animal-like robot, Miro does not possess eyebrows).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempts to explain the differences in the judgment of authenticity and recognition of negative emotions in masking smiles, researchers have called upon the perceptual-attentional limitation hypothesis. This hypothesis posits that the accurate judgment of these expressions relies on the ability to attend to and perceive the necessary cues that distinguish the various expressions from each other [ 7 , 41 , 48 , 49 ]. In other words, if the judgment of authenticity and recognition of negative emotions in masking smile expressions relied on perceptual-attentional processing, greater accuracy would have been expected to be associated with increased attention to the area of the face containing the trace of the negative emotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%