2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The consequences of scale: assessing the distribution of benthic populations in a complex estuarine fjord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results for pebble-sand beaches in the Puget Sound estuary show that there are distinct and persistent trends in biomass that parallel the previously described (Dethier and Schoch 2005) trend in species richness from the inner (more enclosed) end to the outer (more marine) end. The gradients in both parameters are towards much higher values at the marine end, unlike in some estuaries where diversity and biomass show opposite patterns (Giberto et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results for pebble-sand beaches in the Puget Sound estuary show that there are distinct and persistent trends in biomass that parallel the previously described (Dethier and Schoch 2005) trend in species richness from the inner (more enclosed) end to the outer (more marine) end. The gradients in both parameters are towards much higher values at the marine end, unlike in some estuaries where diversity and biomass show opposite patterns (Giberto et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Against this complex backdrop, we chose three of the sampling sites studied previously by Dethier and Schoch (2005) that spanned most (83 km) of the overall estuarine gradient: one site (Budd) in southern (inner) Puget Sound, one (Brown) in south-central, and one (Carkeek) in north-central (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Sites and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several physical variables (e.g., variations in the tidal levels, extent of wave exposure, slope of the shore and substrate heterogeneity) and biological parameters (e.g., predation, herbivory and competition) can influence the distribution of organisms in the intertidal zone (LittLe & KitChing, 1996;rAffAeLLi & hAwKins, 1999;BenedettiCeCChi et al, 2000b;dethier & sChoCh, 2005;MurrAy et al, 2006). These factors determine the non-homogeneous spatial distribution of intertidal communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%