2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.614511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America

Abstract: This report estimates the impact that high levels of enrollment in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) have had on economic trends in rural counties since the program's inception in 1985 until today. The results of a growth model and quasi-experimental control group analysis indicate no discernible impact by the CRP on aggregate county population trends. Aggregate employment growth may have slowed in some high-CRP counties, but only temporarily. High levels of CRP enrollment appear to have affected farm-rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(34 reference statements)
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in United States was initiated in 1980s with most of the first CRP contracts expiring at the beginning of the 21st century. The USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) predicted that about 51 percent of CRP land would have returned to crop production if all of its contracts ended in 2001 [37]. The first batch of GGP's contracts concluded at the end of 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in United States was initiated in 1980s with most of the first CRP contracts expiring at the beginning of the 21st century. The USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) predicted that about 51 percent of CRP land would have returned to crop production if all of its contracts ended in 2001 [37]. The first batch of GGP's contracts concluded at the end of 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research is also needed on how incentive-based mechanisms can account for potential tradeoffs and synergies in the production of multiple ecosystem services. Additional analysis of large-scale PES policies can help us to understand the broader effects on the economy from scaling-up PES schemes (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…usage and yet are based on the same theory. For example, the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program, run by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, has paid farmers to plant permanent vegetation on environmentally sensitive cropland since the mid1980s (13). PES schemes are similar in structure to other incentive-based policies for achieving environmental goals, as highlighted in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paterson and Bryan (2012) tackle an issue that has been of growing concern over the past decades, namely the impact on landscape and NRM caused by policies designed to produce environmental benefits in conjunction with maintenance of http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art32/ productive farming and forestry. Such policies have been widespread from the mid-1980s in the European Union, following the creation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (Hanley et al 1998, Wilson et al 2007, and in the United States, where the Conservation Reserve Program (Rao et al 2007, Sullivan et al 2004) and farmland preservation schemes have a long history (Dorfman et al 2009, Hellerstein andNickerson 2002). In recent years such measures have increasingly been linked directly to policy on climate change, and especially reductions in production of greenhouse gas emissions (Palm et al 2010).…”
Section: Developing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%