Species at Risk Research in Australia 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-68522-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conservation Status of Australian Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conservation status of all species and infraspecific taxa has been assessed and, where appropriate, coded according to the criteria of Leigh et al (1981). The assessment is based on the number of collections, localities and to a less extent estimates of population size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservation status of all species and infraspecific taxa has been assessed and, where appropriate, coded according to the criteria of Leigh et al (1981). The assessment is based on the number of collections, localities and to a less extent estimates of population size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It presumably reflects the effects of urban and rural development and temperate-rain-forest destruction. The distributions of vulnerable and of rare species show high numbers of species in the same two regions, but in addition, these categories are prominent in tropical Cape York and Arnhem Land (Leigh et al 1982a). Despite the widespread location of endangered species, the task of sampling populations of each endangered species is achievable over a five-year period, given the coordinated assistance of botanists in each state.…”
Section: Conservation Of Rare and Endangered Species In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%